2012
DOI: 10.1080/21500894.2012.689258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Naturalism’ and the interpretation of cave art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More to the point, when the term "art" is employed to describe the paintings and engravings of prehistoric man, a whole series of implications are evoked, more or less consciously, regarding what art is in modern industrialized societies: for example, that works of art are made for others to see, that they are things to contemplate but not to use, and so forth. All these implicit analogies, for the most part misleading when applied to Paleolithic cave art, are often uncritically interiorized, influencing the way in which scholars interpret the data from prehistory (Moro Abadía et al 2012; Palacio-Pérez 2013) [3,4]. The suggestion that the Cantabrian caves could be envisaged as "cathedrals" of prehistory, as is still advanced in recent works (Aczel 2009) [5], is emblematic evidence of the persistence of the problem.…”
Section: Methodological Premisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More to the point, when the term "art" is employed to describe the paintings and engravings of prehistoric man, a whole series of implications are evoked, more or less consciously, regarding what art is in modern industrialized societies: for example, that works of art are made for others to see, that they are things to contemplate but not to use, and so forth. All these implicit analogies, for the most part misleading when applied to Paleolithic cave art, are often uncritically interiorized, influencing the way in which scholars interpret the data from prehistory (Moro Abadía et al 2012; Palacio-Pérez 2013) [3,4]. The suggestion that the Cantabrian caves could be envisaged as "cathedrals" of prehistory, as is still advanced in recent works (Aczel 2009) [5], is emblematic evidence of the persistence of the problem.…”
Section: Methodological Premisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before continuing, it is important to note that we do not mean to impute that Natufian artisans were committed to a form of naturalism, slavishly searching for novel patterns to convert into art (cf. Abadía et al 2012). As Gombrich (1968, 304) put the matter, 'the question is not whether nature "really looks" like these pictorial devices but whether pictures with such features suggest a reading in terms of natural objects'.…”
Section: Case Studies From Wadi Hammeh 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, variability in artistic modes of representation was seen, to a great extent, as the result of a chronological succession of styles (e.g. Beltran Martínez 1982; Leroi-Gourhan 1965; Ripoll Perelló 1983; see Moro Abadía et al 2012 for a critique of the naturalistic prejudice that supported the chronologies proposed by twentieth-century European archaeologists). The incidence of the chronological factor was also applied in relation to portable art, as is the case of Serrano (1961) in the archaeology of Paraná River.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%