2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature or nurture? A meta-analysis of the factors that maximize the prediction of digital piracy by using social cognitive theory as a framework

Abstract: This version of the referenced work is the post-print version of the article-it is NOT the final published version nor the corrected proofs. If you would like to receive the final published version, please send a request to any of the authors and we will be happy to send you the latest version. Moreover, you can contact the publisher's website and order the final version there, as well.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A metaanalysis by investigates morality effects on the acquisition of both counterfeit and pirated products, but does not provide information about the relative effects of different drivers of digital piracy. The meta-analysis by Lowry et al (2017) investigates major antecedents of digital piracy and evaluates the contribution of various theoretical explanations by comparing the corresponding drivers' effect size. While the meta-analysis is quite comprehensive, it does not cover all relevant drivers (e.g., user psychographics), nor integrate and test the theoretical perspectives or address the question of cross-cultural variability of digital piracy drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metaanalysis by investigates morality effects on the acquisition of both counterfeit and pirated products, but does not provide information about the relative effects of different drivers of digital piracy. The meta-analysis by Lowry et al (2017) investigates major antecedents of digital piracy and evaluates the contribution of various theoretical explanations by comparing the corresponding drivers' effect size. While the meta-analysis is quite comprehensive, it does not cover all relevant drivers (e.g., user psychographics), nor integrate and test the theoretical perspectives or address the question of cross-cultural variability of digital piracy drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowry et al provide a recent meta analysis and found that four sets of factors maximize the prediction of digital piracy and includes outcome expectancies, social learning, self-efficacy and self regulation, and moral disengagement [69]. But digital piracy can also be influenced by technology considerations such as the quality of infrastructure and access to computers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general-level reasoned action framework from social psychology (i.e., Theory of Reasoned Action, TRA, Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB, and their further developments) [10][11][12] has become the most common theoretical approach to individual-level consumer piracy questions within many disciplines. This is also evident from Lowry, Zhang and Wu's meta-analysis of empirical piracy studies [13]. However, in their basic form, TRA and TPB neglect the normative and moral aspects which are crucial to Proceedings of the 51 st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | 2018 URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50338 ISBN: 978-0-9981331-1-9 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) this context, and have been consequently extended with constructs such as moral obligation [14], or with broader ethics theories [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 72%