2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navier-Stokes Prediction of Internal Flows with a Three-Equation Turbulence Model

Abstract: Nomenclature G= compressible shear-layer growth rate g normalized by its incompressible counterpart g i (G = g/ g i ;2 )]; U 1 and U 2 are U in either stream of a two-stream mixing layer ¡ h u 0 v 0 i = Reynolds stress (ensemble mean) V = Y -component mean velocity Y ¤ 2 = nondimensional y coordinate {Y ¤ 2 =[( y ¡ y 0 )/ d x ]} d x = vorticity thickness {d x =(U 1 ¡ U 2 )/ [@U / @y] MAX } e = dissipation rate q 0 = density uctuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Daly & Harlow 1970;Sarkar & Lakshmanan 1991;Wei, Zhang & Zhou 2004;Younis, Speziale & Clark 2005). Transport models of the scalar fluxes (and variances) predict the flux from an idealized form of the exact scalar flux budget (Launder 1975;Taulbee & VanOsdol 1991;Yoshizawa et al 1997;Duranti & Pittaluga 2000). The goal of both types of closure paradigms is to predict the influence of the turbulent scalar fluxes on the mean (velocity and scalar) flow.…”
Section: Turbulent Mass Flux Effects In Ihvdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Daly & Harlow 1970;Sarkar & Lakshmanan 1991;Wei, Zhang & Zhou 2004;Younis, Speziale & Clark 2005). Transport models of the scalar fluxes (and variances) predict the flux from an idealized form of the exact scalar flux budget (Launder 1975;Taulbee & VanOsdol 1991;Yoshizawa et al 1997;Duranti & Pittaluga 2000). The goal of both types of closure paradigms is to predict the influence of the turbulent scalar fluxes on the mean (velocity and scalar) flow.…”
Section: Turbulent Mass Flux Effects In Ihvdtmentioning
confidence: 99%