2018
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating the Complexities of Undergraduate Medical Curriculum Change: Change Leaders’ Perspectives

Abstract: This empirical, descriptive study enriches the understanding of how institutional leaders navigate the complexities of major medical curriculum changes. The insights serve as a foundation for training and coaching future change leaders. To broaden the understanding of curriculum change processes, future studies could investigate the processes through alternative stakeholder perspectives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LICs are very different from a block rotation-based clinical curriculum and implementing change even for a small cohort LIC that runs alongside an existing curricular structure is challenging. As with any proposed change, attention needs to be given to the process of change which starts with defining and then sharing a vision, followed by broad and enduring consultation with relevant groups, making decisions about the practicalities and then implementing, maintaining, evaluating and developing the changes [24,25].…”
Section: Guideline 1: Manage Change Proactively With a Focus On Buildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LICs are very different from a block rotation-based clinical curriculum and implementing change even for a small cohort LIC that runs alongside an existing curricular structure is challenging. As with any proposed change, attention needs to be given to the process of change which starts with defining and then sharing a vision, followed by broad and enduring consultation with relevant groups, making decisions about the practicalities and then implementing, maintaining, evaluating and developing the changes [24,25].…”
Section: Guideline 1: Manage Change Proactively With a Focus On Buildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is no official definition of IPE to rally round, it makes it more difficult for both the medical programme and the nursing programme to find mutual benefits across the borders of the two professions and hence facilitate practical and joint implementation. Within the IPE frame of educational leaders, IPE was also perceived to represent educational change which has shown often triggers different types of resistance within health professions education environments (McGrath et al, 2016;Velthuis et al, 2018), and the study suggests that it becomes problematic to implement change without perceived support from the senior level leadership. The need for senior organisational support to successfully implement and sustain IPE is a key issue which has been widely reported in the IPE literature (Barr et al, 2005;Bennett et al, 2011;Brewer, 2016;Ginsburg & Tregunno, 2005;Steinert, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rather, a shift is taking place from leader-centred theories to understanding leadership impact based on shared, collaborative, and distributed approaches (McKimm and Lieff 2013). There is increasing recognition that situational (or adaptive) leadership is required to address the complexity inherent in the academic environment (Velthuis et al 2018). As leadership in HPE is multi-layered, within the reality of (medical) school hierarchies, one might be a leader and a follower at the same time (McKimm and O'Sullivan 2016).…”
Section: A Further Exploration Of Leadership In Health Professions Edmentioning
confidence: 99%