Navigation concepts for MR image‐guided interventions

Abstract

The ongoing development of powerful magnetic resonance imaging techniques also allows for advanced possibilities to guide and control minimally invasive interventions. Various navigation concepts have been described for practically all regions of the body. The specific advantages and limitations of these concepts largely depend on the magnet design of the MR scanner and the interventional environment. Open MR scanners involve minimal patient transfer, which improves the interventional workflow and reduces the need for coregistration, ie, the mapping of spatial coordinates between imaging and intervention position. Most diagnostic scanners, in contrast, do not allow the physician to guide his instrument inside the magnet and, consequently, the patient needs to be moved out of the bore. Although adequate coregistration and navigation concepts for closed-bore scanners are technically more challenging, many developments are driven by the well-known capabilities of high-field systems and their better economic value. Advanced concepts such as multimodal overlays, augmented reality displays, and robotic assistance devices are still in their infancy but might propel the use of intraoperative navigation. The goal of this work is to give an update on MRI-based navigation and related techniques and to briefly discuss the clinical experience and limitations of some selected systems.

Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time

“…Especially in cases where computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) guided methods has been unsuccessful, MR (magnetic resonance)-guided biopsy is a promising alternative, due to a high soft-tissue contrast, the option to adjust the imaging plane to the needle trajectory [8] and a good visualisation of vessels without the use of contrast agents [9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover MR-guidance provides the ability to perform a biopsy without the use of ionising radiation, which is of particular importance for younger patients and for the interventional radiologists [14,15].…”

Diagnostic imaging of posterior fossa anomalies in the fetus and neonate: Part 1, normal anatomy and classification of anomalies

“…Standard neonatal brain MR imaging protocols utilize T1-and T2-weighted sequences in multiple planes, which are satisfactory for defining anatomic abnormalities, and diffusion weighting in the axial plane offering important information in cases of ischemic insults and posterior fossa tumors [34,35]. MR imaging is also critical for intraoperative guidance during tumor resection [36]. …”

White Paper: Interventional MRI: Current Status and Potential for Development Considering Economic Perspectives, Part 1: General Application

“…They range from simple components for holding and introducing needles and manipulators for setting a certain trajectory to full navigation systems with visual feedback and typically include special application software [74] (▶ Fig. 6).…”