NBIC-Convergence and Technoethics

Abstract

Technoethics is a new, but rapidly developing field of ethical reflection of technoscience. It can claim to unite the various ethical projections of the science and technology development in a common approach. One of the starting points of understanding this role of technoethics may be NBIC-convergence. The ethical dimensions of the NBIC-projects is represented in these sub-areas of applied ethics as a nanoethics, bioethics, neuroethics and ICT ethics. In this article particular attention is paid to the biomedical field, which is a prime example of innovative high technology, as well as the interaction of different types of ethics.

El emprendimiento de base tecnológica y su punto de encuentro con la convergencia tecnocientífica: una revisión a partir del algoritmo Tree of Science

“…Los laboratorios de investigación y las aulas integran de la ciencia y la ingeniería desde la nanoescala y en la mejora del aprendizaje. En resumen, a partir de estas agrupaciones se identificaron diferentes relaciones entre la convergencia con la nanotecnología, las líneas de investigación de la convergencia, disponibilidad de talento humano, sistemas semánticos, la mejora del desempeño humano, aceleración de productos y servicios innovadores, sinergias de la convergencia, libertad cognitiva, la integración de la ciencia y la ingeniería, relaciones interdisciplinarias NBIC, gobernanza para estas tecnologías, problemas éticossociales y la convergencia del conocimiento y la tecnología en beneficio de la sociedad (Schneider y Veugelers, 2010;André, 2017;Giraudo et al, 2019;Grebenshchikova, 2018;Frochot et al, 2020).…”

Digitalization: public opinion landscapes (on the example of Russia)

“…It should be emphasized that on the whole, there are no either large-scale sociological stu dies of public perception of digitalization ideologemes and real processes by the Russian citizens in the Russian sociology or foreign works in this area. Nevertheless, there are a number of authors who study the issues related to the technological development of society whose works are devoted to the socio-humanitarian aspects of convergent technologies and technoscience (Aseeva, 2015(Aseeva, , 2016(Aseeva, , 2017, sociology and cyberspace interfaces (Romanovsky, 2000 ), the crisis of technological civilization and innovative development (Kamensky & Boev, 2015), the socio-humanitarian expertise of biomedical innovations (Aseeva & Budanov, 2015), the ethical aspects of NBIC-Convergence (Grebenshchikova, 2016), the new paradigm of sociology in a complex society (Kravchenko, 2012a(Kravchenko, , 2012b, sociocultural transformations of global modernization (Matveeva & Sarapul'tseva, 2019), the answer to the question regarding the mechanism of humanitarian visuality (Kurasawa, 2015), digital culture issues (Rius-Ulldemolins, Pecourt, & Arostegui, 2019), Big data in sociological analysis of the text (Cointet & Parasie, 2018), digital health issues and medical innovation (Lennon et al, 2017), sociology of privacy (Anthony, Campos-Castillo, & Horne, 2017), case studies of digital media (Fero, 2015), cultural cyber-utopianism (Rius-Ulldemolins, 2015), etc.…”

Improving the Efficiency of the Organization Based on the Automation Criterion

“…Из анализа публикуемой литературы можно выделить следующих авторов, которые рассматривали вопрос влияния человеческого фактора на принятие управленческого решения: И. П. Скворцов, А. О. Титарев [1], И. В. Калуцкий, А. А. Агафонов [2], Д. Г. Маркова [3], А. В. Енгибарян, Ф. В. Шутилов [4]; В. А. Гончаренко, А. Н. Богатова, В. Е. Хабаров [5]; Ю. А. Зуева [6]; А. А. Гребенщикова [7]; А. В. Енгибарян, Ф. В. Шутилов [8]; Е. С. Даш-кова [9]; Е. А. Демидова [10]; А. О. Алексеев [11] и другие.…”