2008
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818042d6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: An Important Monitoring Tool During Hybrid Aortic Arch Replacement

Abstract: Near-infrared spectroscopy can be helpful for monitoring the adequacy of cerebral perfusion during cardiovascular surgery. We report changes seen in regional oxygen saturation due to intraoperative thrombosis of the left common carotid artery graft during hybrid aortic arch replacement for traumatic aortic injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…9,10 As the technology provides information about perfusion and oxygenation of the tissue bed underlying the sensor, it has been used to define thresholds for safe perfusion during carotid endarterectomy, to provide information during cerebral aneurysm embolization, and in a variety of cardiac surgery settings including high-risk surgery, arch surgery and for monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass. [11][12][13][14][15] Changes to cerebral oximetry values can be addressed by measures including increasing delivered oxygen, allowing carbon dioxide to rise to increase cerebral blood flow, use of agents to alter haemodynamics or transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Girişim sırasında kontralateral hemisferin desatürasyonu NIRS ve EEG monitörleri ile hızlıca tespit edilerek sol karotid arter ayrıca kanüle edilip ek olarak sol beyin perfüzyonu sağlana-bilir. Bu nedenle perfüzyon eksikliğinin erken saptanması oldukça önem arz eder ve nörolojik prognozu iyileştirir (15). Aort cerrahisi geçiren bu hastada her iki monitörle tüm ameliyat boyunca ve özellikle ASSP sırasında perfüzyon yeterliliği ve kontralateral hemisfer farkı değerlendirildi.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Cerebral oximetry is helpful in various surgical procedures [4][5][6][7]. Near-infrared spectroscopy is also an important monitoring tool during hybrid aortic arch replacement [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%