2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-IR spectroscopy of OH/IR stars in the Galactic centre

Abstract: Context. Based on the expansion velocities of their circumstellar shells, Galactic centre (GC) OH/IR stars can be divided into two groups that are kinematically different and therefore believed to have evolved from different stellar populations. Aims. We studied the metallicity distribution of the OH/IR stars population in the GC on the basis of a theoretical relation between EW(Na), EW(Ca), and EW(CO) and the metallicity.Methods. For 70 OH/IR stars in the GC, we obtained near-IR spectra. The equivalent line-w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schultheis et al (2003) note the typical errors on metallicities determined by this method to be about 0.1 dex. Using equivalent widths of the same near-infrared lines reported by Vanhollebeke et al (2006), OH359 is found to have [Fe/H] = -0.81. The distribution of metallicities of the Galactic Bulge star sample of Schultheis et al (2003) spans [Fe/H] from 0.5 down to < -2.0 dex, with the histogram of metallicities peaking around -0.3 dex.…”
Section: Gas/dust Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schultheis et al (2003) note the typical errors on metallicities determined by this method to be about 0.1 dex. Using equivalent widths of the same near-infrared lines reported by Vanhollebeke et al (2006), OH359 is found to have [Fe/H] = -0.81. The distribution of metallicities of the Galactic Bulge star sample of Schultheis et al (2003) spans [Fe/H] from 0.5 down to < -2.0 dex, with the histogram of metallicities peaking around -0.3 dex.…”
Section: Gas/dust Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The Galactic Bulge is an ideal place to make such determinations, as the distance to the stars is well-known (∼ 8 kpc), which reduces uncertainty in these stars' other properties (e.g., luminosity). By determining reliable gas-to-dust ratios for these stars, for which we also know metallicity (see Schultheis et al 2003;Vanhollebeke et al 2006), we hope to be able to determine gas-to-dust ratios for lower-metallicity environments, like the Magellanic Clouds. We note specifically that OH359, E51, and A12 have metallicities very similar to that of the Small Magellanic Cloud of [Fe/H] = -0.64 (Russell & Dopita 1992;Rolleston et al 1999), and A51 has a metallicity quite similar to that of the Large -15 -Magellanic Cloud, which has [Fe/H] = -0.30 (Russell & Dopita 1992); therefore, our work applies to studies of mass loss in the Magellanic Clouds.…”
Section: Gas/dust Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such errors were noted as a difficulty in the measurement of individual metal lines by Vanhollebeke et al (2006). In order to verify this, we added random noise to the data at the level of a few percent, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, although the same kind of relation should be expected, nothing can be said about the behaviour of the Ca feature. The ranges used to derive this equivalent width are influenced by more metallic lines and molecular bands (for example Ni, Sc and the CN band, see Vanhollebeke et al 2006, for a detailed list and discussion) than the ones for the other two features, thus making the modelling and extrapolation between resolutions harder. As a result, over the range of metallicities computed for the NextGen library (a grid at [M/H] = 0.0, −0.3, −0.5, −0.7), the equivalent widths derived are restricted to EW(Ca) < 3, while our sample distribution peaks at EW(Ca) ∼ 5.…”
Section: Equivalent Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%