2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(02)00261-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near optimum estimation of local fractal dimension for image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several practical box-counting dimension methods were put forward for FD estimation [33][34][35][36][37]. Buczkowski et al [38] developed a modified box-counting dimension method eliminating the border effect and non-integer values of the length of box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several practical box-counting dimension methods were put forward for FD estimation [33][34][35][36][37]. Buczkowski et al [38] developed a modified box-counting dimension method eliminating the border effect and non-integer values of the length of box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methods are based on the structure assessment using the difference between the covering areas. As noticed in FD calculation and texture/pattern estimation [25], the first few iterations are mainly sensitive to the structure, that is, to the most noticeable notches. Thus, the adaptive technique in the first iterations seems to be useful in the identification.…”
Section: Multiscale Heart Sound Identificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kuklinski [2] applied fractal analysis techniques to medical images, for automatic identification of cancerous growth regions; Zwiggelaar & Bull [12] applied them to the problem of plant recognition in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. These and other applications can be seen in [7,9,10,11]. These are just a few applications that clearly demonstrate serious interest in fractal based methods for low-level recognition problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%