2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10030138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near Real-Time Semantic View Analysis of 3D City Models in Web Browser

Abstract: 3D city models and their browser-based applications have become an increasingly applied tool in the cities. One of their applications is the analysis views and visibility, applicable to property valuation and evaluation of urban green infrastructure. We present a near real-time semantic view analysis relying on a 3D city model, implemented in a web browser. The analysis is tested in two alternative use cases: property valuation and evaluation of the urban green infrastructure. The results describe the elements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another CityGML data model usage consists of a compact and developers‐friendly encoding alternative of this data model: CityJSON (Ledoux et al, 2019). Besides its simplicity and easiness to handle city models, many advantages derive from the JSON encoding and its semi‐opened structure: native support of metadata and refined levels‐of‐detail (LoD; Nys et al, 2020), easier integration in common GIS tools (Vitalis et al, 2020), lightweight and scalable base to support complex web applications (Virtanen et al, 2021), usage of combinatorial maps in topology structure (Vitalis, Ohori, et al, 2019), etc. This new encoding solution opens possibilities by reducing the cost of modifying data but also facilitates its exchange.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another CityGML data model usage consists of a compact and developers‐friendly encoding alternative of this data model: CityJSON (Ledoux et al, 2019). Besides its simplicity and easiness to handle city models, many advantages derive from the JSON encoding and its semi‐opened structure: native support of metadata and refined levels‐of‐detail (LoD; Nys et al, 2020), easier integration in common GIS tools (Vitalis et al, 2020), lightweight and scalable base to support complex web applications (Virtanen et al, 2021), usage of combinatorial maps in topology structure (Vitalis, Ohori, et al, 2019), etc. This new encoding solution opens possibilities by reducing the cost of modifying data but also facilitates its exchange.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its improved support of levels of detail and metadata make it a good substitute for CityGML (Nys, Poux, & Billen, 2020). However, its usage is still limited to specific applications and data encoding (Kumar, Ledoux, & Stoter, 2018; Nys, Billen, & Poux, 2020; Virtanen et al., 2021). Besides, the new support of 3D models in QGIS should improve its usability thanks to the development of a CityJSON plugin (Vitalis, Arroyo Ohori, & Stoter, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the new CityJSON facilitates the evolution of advance decision-making processes. For instance, its lightness and ease to maintain are demonstrated in flood simulations and complex semantic view analysis (Kumar et al, 2018;Virtanen et al, 2021). Still, its core module (v1.0.1) has not been much extended for now, with one exception on topological representation (Stelios Vitalis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%