1995
DOI: 10.21236/ada344017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Wall Measurements of a Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer.

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 1 hour per response, indudiflg the time ft and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regard information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for inform! 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All tests were conducted in the Stanford Flow Control Wind Tunnel. Details regarding the tunnel are given in Compton (1995). This was a recirculating wind tunnel with a maximum velocity in the test section of 22 m/s, very good flow uniformity, and freestream turbulence intensities less than 0.5%.…”
Section: Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tests were conducted in the Stanford Flow Control Wind Tunnel. Details regarding the tunnel are given in Compton (1995). This was a recirculating wind tunnel with a maximum velocity in the test section of 22 m/s, very good flow uniformity, and freestream turbulence intensities less than 0.5%.…”
Section: Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three profiles collapse onto one line in the near-wall region. This is also more or less the case for the measurements of Compton & Eaton (1995) but not for those ofÖlçmen & Simpson (1996) where γ τ lags γ g . The profiles at stations 10U and 10D are characteristic of cross-over behaviour and all three angles change sign twice.…”
Section: Characteristic Flow Anglesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Klinksiek & Pierce (1970) measured mean velocity profiles with two-sided lateral skewing in an 'S'-shaped channel of rectangular crosssection and Webster, DeGraaff & Eaton (1996) in a boundary layer over a swept bump. Recent measurements were performed by Schwarz & Bradshaw (1992, 1994 and by Compton & Eaton (1995) in a curved duct with unilaterally skewed velocity profiles and byÖlçmen & Simpson (1995b), in the flow of a wing-body junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elliptical leading edge of the flat plate (plate a) has a fineness ratio of 0.3 as typically found for low-speed boundary layer investigations. [18][19][20][21] The EMFC device is located between the two filler plates labeled c. Additionally, a trailing edge plate d completes the assembly.…”
Section: Low Speed Facility Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%