2002
DOI: 10.1122/1.1446882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-wall particle depletion in a flowing colloidal suspension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For penetration depths of 0.5 µm or more (d/a 2.4), the measured concentration does not decrease further at higher shear rates, and for the penetration depth of 1 µm (d/a = 5.1) the measured concentration even increases. A similar phenomenon was seen in the experiments on suspensions with ethylcellulose particles [1]. It was shown to be caused by competing effects.…”
Section: Atr-ir Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For penetration depths of 0.5 µm or more (d/a 2.4), the measured concentration does not decrease further at higher shear rates, and for the penetration depth of 1 µm (d/a = 5.1) the measured concentration even increases. A similar phenomenon was seen in the experiments on suspensions with ethylcellulose particles [1]. It was shown to be caused by competing effects.…”
Section: Atr-ir Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…10a). This accounts for the effect where the measured concentration of particles first decreases and then For comparison the results for ethylcellulose (EC) particles in the radius range 50 to 300 nm [1] are also shown. The Peclet number and δ/a for the EC particles are based on the larger diameter of the bimodal particle size distribution.…”
Section: Atr-ir Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several mechanisms may lead to smaller improvements in heat transfer coefficient between the nanofluids and the base fluids at higher temperature. These include: (1) rapid alignment of \nanoparticles in lower viscosity fluids, leading to less contact between nanoparticles, and (2) depletion of particles in the near-wall fluid phase [23], leading to an intrinsically lower thermal conductivity layer at the wall. Understanding and isolating which mechanism or mechanisms might be responsible for the experimental results will require significant future work, including computational fluid dynamic modeling of the flows in nanoparticle dispersions.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Loading Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%