2022
DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nebulous without white: annotated long-read genome assembly and CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering in Drosophila nebulosa

Abstract: The diversity among Drosophila species presents an opportunity to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of biological phenomena. A challenge to investigating these species is that, unlike the plethora of molecular and genetics tools available for D. melanogaster research, many other species do not have sequenced genomes; a requirement for employing these tools. Selecting transgenic flies through white (w) complementation has been commonly practiced in numerous Drosophila species. While tolera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(150 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probe designs for nos were based on the coding sequence for all species, FBgn0002962 for D. mel (FlyBase), UniProt entry A0A6I8V5B3 for D. pse , and Q24710 for D. vir . For D. neb , the nos and pgc sequences were identified using the D. neb annotated long-read sequenced genome ( Sottolano, et al 2022 ). For D. mel , cycB and gcl probes targeting their coding sequence were generated based on FlyBase sequences FBgn0000405, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 590 dye, and FBgn0005695, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 610 Dye, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probe designs for nos were based on the coding sequence for all species, FBgn0002962 for D. mel (FlyBase), UniProt entry A0A6I8V5B3 for D. pse , and Q24710 for D. vir . For D. neb , the nos and pgc sequences were identified using the D. neb annotated long-read sequenced genome ( Sottolano, et al 2022 ). For D. mel , cycB and gcl probes targeting their coding sequence were generated based on FlyBase sequences FBgn0000405, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 590 dye, and FBgn0005695, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 610 Dye, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For osk sequences, UniProt entry numbers B4LXK5 and A0A6I8URE4 were used for D. vir and D. pse. For D. neb , rpl7 and osk sequences were determined using the D. neb annotated long-read sequenced genome ( Sottolano, et al 2022 ). For all expression assays, the presented fold gene expression levels are displayed as values relative to D. mel and were calculated using the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method ( Livak and Schmittgen 2001 ) using rpl7 as an internal control ( Valentino, et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probe designs for nos were based on the coding sequence for all species, FBgn0002962 for D. mel (FlyBase), UniProt entry A0A6I8V5B3 for D. pse , and Q24710 for D. vir . For D. neb , the nos and pgc sequences were identified using the D. neb annotated long-read sequenced genome [46]. For D. mel, cycB , and gcl probes targeting their coding sequence were generated based on FlyBase sequences FBgn0000405, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 590 dye, and sequence FBgn0005695, labeled with CAL Fluor Red 610 Dye, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For osk sequences, UniProt entry numbers B4LXK5 and A0A6I8URE4 were used for D. vir and D. pse . For D. neb , rpl7 and osk sequences were determined using the D. neb annotated long-read sequenced genome [46]. For all expression assays, the presented fold gene expression levels are relative to D. mel and were calculated using the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method [49] using rpl7 as an internal control [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation