aims:
The aim of the present study is to check with STOPP/START Criteria if such drugs are subjected to potentially inappropriate prescriptions/omissions in a population with AF, and to determine their impact on mortality in elderly.
background:
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common pathology in elderly. One of the keys to its management is blood-thinning therapy, in particular, Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT), consisting of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) and the more recent Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).
method:
This study included subjects with AF consecutively evaluated between 2013 and 2019 at the Geriatric Outpatient Service, University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, and followed-up for 36 months. A sum of 427 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The OAT-group was made up of 330 people, and the other 97 people constitute the non-OAT-group. The sample was assessed for STOPP/START criteria.
result:
We found no difference (p>0.1) in comorbidity burden, frailty, and cardio-cerebro-vascular diseases’ prevalence in the two groups, who also did not present difference in 36-months mortality (p=0.97). OAT was overall appropriately taken, and 62.4% of OAT-group presented the START criterion to take antiplatelets but also the STOPP criterion not to take them, because of the simultaneous anticoagulants’ intake. In non-OAT-group, 69.1% presented the START criterion to take anticoagulants, and 21.6% the START criterion to take antiplatelets.
conclusion:
Our study demonstrated that patients with AF are often prone to under- or over-prescriptions, particularly of antithrombotic drugs, and STOPP/START criteria are valid tool in assessing and correcting any wrong therapeutic choices. Moreover, in frail and comorbid subjects, survival is not correlated with the assumption of OAT.