(1) Background: The association between polypharmacy and malnutrition has been investigated in several studies; however, few of these specifically deepened the relationship between potentially inappropriate medication and malnutrition. With a descriptive approach, the primary aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the nutritional status, assessed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), on potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), estimated 10-year survival, and the risk of adverse drug reactions in elderly patients; the secondary aim was to evaluate how the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions (STOPP), Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START), and BEERS 2019 criteria identify PIM compared to nutritional status. (2) Methods: In this study, 3091 subjects were enrolled, of whom 2748 (71.7%) were women; the median age was 80 years, with an interquartile range between 75 and 85 years of age. The subjects were assessed at the outpatient service for frail older people of the University Hospital of Cagliari. The study population was evaluated for their: MNA, Charlson Comorbidity Index, 10-year survival estimation, BEERS 2019, STOPP and START criteria, and ADR Risk scores. (3) Results: We divided the study population into three groups: MNA1 (MNA score ≥ 24), MNA2 (23.5–17), and MNA3 (<17): the severity of comorbidities, STOPP and START alerts, and BEERS 2019 criteria were significantly worse in both MNA2 and MNA3 compared to MNA1—with the exception of BEERS “non-anti-infective medications that should be avoided or have their dosage reduced with varying levels of kidney function in older adults”. Moreover, the estimated 10-year survival was significantly higher in MNA1 than in MNA2 and MNA3, and also in MNA2 compared to MNA3. Finally, the ADR risk scores were significantly lower in MNA1 than in MNA2 and MNA3. (4) Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the association between nutritional status and PIM checked with the BEERS 2019 criteria, and, for the first time, with the STOPP and START criteria.

Considering the need to intercept neurocognitive damage as soon as possible, it would be useful to extend cognitive test screening throughout the population. Here, we propose differential cut-off levels that can be used to identify mild and severe cognitive impairment with a simple and widely used first-level neurocognitive screening test: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We studied a population of 262 patients referred for cognitive impairment testing using the MMSE and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), a neuropsychological battery. The sample consisted of 262 participants with mean age 73.8 years (60–87), of whom 154 (58.8%) women. No significant gender-related differences in cognitive ability were identified. The two tests (MMSE and RBANS) showed a moderate correlation in identifying cognitive deficit. We used RBANS as a categorial variable to identify different degrees of cognitive impairment. Youden’s J indexes were used to consider the better sensitivity/specificity balance in the 24-point cut-off score for severe cognitive deficit, 29.7-point score for mild cognitive deficit, and 26.1-point score for both mild and severe cognitive deficit. The study shows that the MMSE does not identify early cognitive impairment. Though different cut-offs are needed to discriminate different impairment degrees, the 26.1-point score seems to be preferable to the others.

BackgroundThe assessment process of elderly people considers all aspects of an individual’s life, including physical, mental, and social aspects. Frailty refers to a decline in physiological functions or strengths leading to increased vulnerability to stressors and decreased ability to cope with them. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a validated and useful tool in this context to holistically study elderly people. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of impaired health status in a large geriatric population turning to outpatient service, based on the components of the CGA, and thus to describe its usefulness in real-life clinical practice. The secondary aim of this study was the evaluation of the association between nutritional status, assessed with Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)—within the CGA—and cognitive-affective and functional capacities, and multimorbidity.Materials and methodsThis real-life, retrospective cross-sectional study included subjects consecutively evaluated from January 2009 to December 2020 at the Geriatric Outpatient Service, University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy. A sum of 3,260 patients were subjected to CGA.ResultsOnly a small proportion of the sample (2.24%) showed an absence of impairment in cognitive-affective, functional, and nutritional domains. Moderate correlations were found between MNA and several other CGA variables, namely, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; ϱ = −0.41, p &lt; 0.0001), Barthel Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (ϱ = 0.51, p &lt; 0.0001), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (ϱ = 0.43, p &lt; 0.0001), and Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (ϱ = 0.44, p &lt; 0.0001). A multiple regression also highlighted these variables as significant regressors of MNA. Finally, malnutrition showed a significant association with depression (odds ratio [OR]: 4.97), dependence on ADL (OR: 19.8) and IADL (OR: 7.04), and falling risk (OR: 5.16).ConclusionThis study has figured out the complex situation in which geriatric care finds itself the complexity and severe impairment of elderly people. The possibilities of intervention are often limited, but the literature confirms the benefits of good nutritional status on the general health status. The data that emerged from our study fit into this assumption, highlighting the close association between the nutritional domain and the other CGA domains.

Background: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of anemia—according to the WHO criteria—on cognitive performances, mood, functional and nutritional status, and comorbidities in a population of subjects aged 65 years or older. The secondary aim of this study was to understand if different hemoglobin cut-off levels are associated with a variation of the mentioned domains’ impairment. Methods: We designed a cross-sectional study, including subjects aged 65 or more consecutively evaluated in an outpatient setting from July 2013 to December 2019. A sum of 1698 subjects met the inclusion criteria. They were evaluated with: MMSE and CDT (cognitive assessment), GDS (mood), BADL, IADL, PPT, and POMA (autonomies), MNA (nutritional status), and CIRS (comorbidities). Results: According to the WHO criteria, non-anemic patients reported significantly better performances than the anemics in BADL (p < 0.0001), IADL (p = 0.0007), PPT (p = 0.0278), POMA (p = 0.0235), MNA, CIRS TOT, CIRS ICC, and CIRS ISC (p < 0.0001). The same tendency has been found by considering the 12 g/dL- and the 13 g/dL-cut-off level in the whole population. The multivariate analysis showed that, considering the 12 g/dL-cut-off level, age (OR: 1.03, p = 0.0072), CIRS (OR: 1.08, p < 0.0001), and gender (OR: 0.57, p = 0.0007) were significant regressors of anemia, while considering the 13 g/dL-cut-off level, age (OR: 1.04, p = 0.0001), POMA (OR: 1.03, p = 0.0172), MNA (OR = 0.95, p = 0.0036), CIRS (OR: 1.17, p < 0.0001), ICC (OR = 0.83, p = 0.018), and gender (OR = 0.48, p < 0.0001) were significant regressors of anemia, while the other CGA variables were excluded by the model (p > 0.01). Conclusions: Our study showed that anemia negatively impact on geriatric people’s general status, regardless of which hemoglobin cut-off level is considered. It also highlighted that hemoglobin concentrations < 13 g/dL, regardless of gender, have an association with the impairment of the affective-functional-nutritional state as well as an increase in comorbidities; therefore, it should be pursuable to consider the elderly person “anemic” if Hb < 13 g/dL regardless of gender.

BackgroundWith the aging of the population, the characterization of frailty and comorbidity burden is increasingly taking on particular importance. The aims of the present study are to analyze such conditions in a population affected by Atrial Fibrillation (AF), matching it with a population without AF, and to recognize potential independent factors associated with such common cardiovascular disease.MethodsThis study included subjects consecutively evaluated over 5 years at the Geriatric Outpatient Service, University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy. A sum of 1981 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The AF-group was made up of 330 people, and another 330 people were randomly selected to made up the non-AF-group. The sample was subjected to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA).ResultsIn our sample, severe comorbidity burden (p = 0.01) and frailty status (p = 0.04) were significantly more common in patients with AF than without AF, independently on gender and age. Furthermore, the 5-years follow-up demonstrated that survival probability was significantly higher in AF-group (p = 0.03). The multivariate analysis (AUC: 0.808) showed that the presence of AF was independently positively associated with a history of coronary heart disease (OR: 2.12) and cerebrovascular disease (OR: 1.64), with the assumption of Beta Blockers (OR: 3.39), and with the number of drugs taken (OR: 1.12), and negatively associated with the assumption of antiplatelets (OR: 0.09).ConclusionsElderly people with AF are frailer, have more severe comorbidities, and take more drugs, in particular beta blockers, than people without AF, who conversely have a higher survival probability. Furthermore, it is necessary to pay attention to antiplatelets, especially in AF-group, in order to avoid dangerous under- or over-prescriptions.