“…They normally involve the analysis of neck motion, which forensic medical examiners and rehabilitation physicians hold as a useful instrument in the assessment of WAD sequelae and recovery control (Vivas Broseta et al, 2017). However, the evidence of their validity and prognostic value is still limited in comparison with PROMs (Nordin et al, 2008 motion analysis for WAD assessment, chiefly in terms of the reliability of the kinematic measures (Hanney et al, 2014;Michiels et al, 2014;Popovich Jr. et al, 2015;Sarig Bahat et al, 2016;Vorro et al, 2013;Williams et al, 2011) and their capacity to discriminate between patients and controls (Baydal-Bertomeu et al, 2011;Sarig Bahat et al, 2015;Stenneberg et al, 2017;Tsang et al, 2014). The most frequently studied kinematic parameter is neck range of motion (ROM), although some of those studies also focus on other motion measures like velocity, smoothness or harmonicity of repeated movements.…”