2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511973420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Binomial Regression

Abstract: Submissions to the STB, including submissions to the supporting files (programs, datasets, and help files), are on a nonexclusive, free-use basis. In particular, the author grants to StataCorp the nonexclusive right to copyright and distribute the material in accordance with the Copyright Statement below. The author also grants to StataCorp the right to freely use the ideas, including communication of the ideas to other parties, even if the material is never published in the STB. Submissions should be addresse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
527
0
65

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,988 publications
(597 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
527
0
65
Order By: Relevance
“…Since over-dispersion was present (and also the variance of the number of admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions was greater than the mean), we preferred a negative binomial model (with a log-link) to a Poisson model. 43 We selected covariates using the Akaike Information Criterion; this supported including all of our chosen covariates. 44 We expected that two patients in the same practice were likely to have more similar rates of admission than two patients in randomly different practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since over-dispersion was present (and also the variance of the number of admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions was greater than the mean), we preferred a negative binomial model (with a log-link) to a Poisson model. 43 We selected covariates using the Akaike Information Criterion; this supported including all of our chosen covariates. 44 We expected that two patients in the same practice were likely to have more similar rates of admission than two patients in randomly different practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coefficients were reported as the incidence rate ratio (IRR), i.e. a one-unit increase in the predictor value leads to an increase/decrease of the outcome by a factor of e b , whereby b is the estimated parameter [36]. The model contained age group and years in prison (linear and quadratic polynomial) as predictors of interest, correcting for the following covariates: prison and marital status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aribarg et al model had a Poisson distribution for the frequencies, and an exponential distribution for the magnitudes. A well-known problem for the Poisson distribution is over-dispersion (see, e.g., Hilbe, 2011), often due to individual differences among subjects. Three popular alternative frequency distributions are available to deal with over-dispersion: The negative binomial, the compound Poisson-gamma, and compound Poisson-log-normal (Johnson et al, 1993).…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%