Negative Effects of Non-Tariff Trade Barriers on the Welfare of Indonesians

Amanta, Felippa; Wibisono, Iqbal Dawam

doi:10.35497/341329

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The long‐term investment in assets and transfer of the cost associated with NTMs to consumers and traders may offset the immediate impact of a decline in household income by 6% thus reducing the probability of households falling below the poverty line. The result is consistent with Amanta and Wibisono (2021) who find that removing non‐tariff measures on rice and meat would lead to an overall reduction of the poverty rate by 2.8 percentage points.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Non‐tariff measures and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana

Martey,

Onumah,

Onumah

et al. 2023

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most studies on the impacts of non‐tariff measures (NTMs) on economic outcomes are at the macro‐level with limited micro‐level studies. This study uses primary data on 604 commercial farm households in Ghana to examine the relationship between NTMs and household welfare outcomes. The results show that NTMs are positively associated with assets, household expenditure and income but negatively associated with food expenditure, household dietary diversity score (HDDS) and poverty probability index (PPI). We find that the results are not likely to be driven by unobserved heterogeneity. Our results suggest that the potential mechanisms through which NTMs influence welfare outcomes are household income and expenditure. The main implication of the study is that a reduction in the number of customs formalities and the cost of testing and certification can facilitate trade and contribute to the economic development of commercial farm households.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Non‐tariff measures and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana

Martey,

Onumah,

Onumah

et al. 2023

J of Intl Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Selain itu, monopoli oleh Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) untuk impor sejumlah komoditas tertentu juga diperbolehkan, seperti jagung untuk pakan ternak. 9 Rapat antar kementerian melibatkan Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian (Kemenko Perekonomian), Kemendag, dan Kementan (Amanta & Wibisono, 2021). Walaupun kementerian-kementerian ini memiliki kuasa untuk memberlakukan restriksi impor pangan, mereka tidak menjadi bagian dari TPPS.…”

Section: Kebijakan Perdagangan Yang Menghambat Keterjangkauan Panganunclassified

“…Penghapusan NTM juga dapat mengurangi angka kemiskinan-penyebab tidak langsung dari stunting. Sebuah studi yang dilakukan oleh CIPS memperkirakan bahwa penghapusan NTM atas beras dan daging sapi dapat mengurangi angka kemiskinan sebesar 2,83 poin persentase secara nasional, dan 3,77 poin persentase di wilayah-wilayah perdesaan dimana kemiskinan terkonsentrasi (Amanta & Wibisono, 2021).…”

Section: Kebijakanunclassified

Hambatan dalam Mewujudkan Konsumsi Pangan yang Lebih Sehat Kasus Kebijakan Perdagangan dan Pertanian

Alta¹,

Auliya²,

Fauzi³

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Quota allocation is determined through inter-ministerial coordination meetings and grants a monopoly on imports of certain commodities, such as corn for feed, to state-owned enterprises (SOE). 9 The inter-ministerial meeting involves the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, the MOT, and the MOA (Amanta & Wibisono, 2021). While these ministries have the power to impose import restrictions on food, they are not part of the National Team to Accelerate Stunting Reduction.…”

Section: Key Policy Barriers To Healthier Dietsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Removal of NTMs can also reduce the poverty rate-an indirect cause of stunting. A CIPS study estimates that removing NTMs on rice and meat will reduce the poverty rate by 2.83 percentage points nationally, and 3.77 percentage points in rural areas where poverty is concentrated (Amanta & Wibisono, 2021).…”

Section: Key Policy Barriers To Healthier Dietsmentioning

confidence: 99%