To study what patients with acute coronary heart disease (CHD) considered the three most stressful factors experienced during the month prior to testing and what they attributed their heart disease to.Methods: Studied the occurrence and severity of physiological, psychological, and psychosocial stressors in 117 patients with acute CHD and 117 referents, not diagnosed as having CHD, matched by age, sex, and municipality. Subjects were first to select from a list of potentially stressful factors those they themselves considered stressful. They were then to select the three they regarded as most stressful and to provide situational accounts of these.
Results:The CHD patients were found to less frequently live with a partner, more frequently have a BMI higher than 30.0 and to report a greater number of stressors. The stressors best differentiating them from the referents were fatigue, shortness of breath, pain, and high blood pressure. The causal factors they most frequently named were heart problems, smoking, heredity, high workload, and poor eating habits.
Conclusions:The situational accounts the patients provided illustrate the biopsychosocial complexities involved in the various categories of stressful factors.
___________________________________________________________________________CHD from an integrated biopsychosocial perspective 3 In coronary heart disease (CHD), conventional risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia have been reported to explain 50-90% of the risk involved.
1,2Recent studies have also provided substantial evidence for various psychological and psychosocial factors (e.g., stress, hostility, depression, social support, socioeconomic status) being connected with the morbidity and mortality associated with CHD.3,4 The increased risk produced such factors produce, although reportedly more consistent for certain factors such as depression and lack of social support, has been regarded as similar in strength to that produced by the conventional risk factors. and -due to a lack of large controlled trials -uncertainties persist regarding the therapeutic efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions. 3,6,7 Additional issues arise from using different conceptualizations and measures of the psychological and psychosocial variables involved (e.g., stress, depression, hostility). 3 In the literature, there is a striking overlap between what have been described both as traditional features of masculinity (such as hostility, independence, and self-confidence), and as characteristics of the coronary-prone individual. 8 Also, the quality of life-questionnaires employed generally involve use of only global measures and fail to address the problems experienced by the patients within a contextual framework defined by the patients themselves.As several authors have pointed out, understanding lay persons' experience of their illness is important for prevention and education in CHD. 5,9-11 To explore such understanding, CHD from an integrated biopsychosocial perspective 4 ...