Negative Life Events and Depressive Symptoms in Late Adolescence: Bonding and Cognitive Coping as Vulnerability Factors?

Kraaij, Vivian; Garnefski, Nadia; Wilde, Erik; Dijkstra, Arie; Gebhardt, Winifred A.; Maes, Stan; Doest, Laura ter

doi:10.1023/a:1022543419747

Cited by 224 publications

(162 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

141

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There are some studies in the literature that mentioned the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and stress (e.g., Carlson & Perrewe, 1999;Garnefski et al, 2001;Garnefski et al, 2003;Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006;Jermann et al, 2006;Kraaij et al, 2003). In the literature, social support has been emphasized as a solution to stressfull life events or organizational stress (Thomas & Ganster, 1995).…”

Section: Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stress: Moderating Role of Social Support

Demirtaş¹,

Özdevecioğlu²,

Çapar³

2015

ASS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study examined the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation, social support and job stress. First, we investigated the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and job stress. Second, we also have investigated that social support from work (peers or supervisors) and non-work (family or social networks) have a moderatoring effect on the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and job stress. Based on a survey of 127 employees, we found support for our hypotheses that there is a negative relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and job stress. The results also show that work-related and non-work related social support positively moderates the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and job stress. Results and implications are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.

show abstract

Section: Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stress: Moderating Role of Social Support

Demirtaş¹,

Özdevecioğlu²,

Çapar³

2015

ASS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Environmental factors include negative life events and conditions (Beasley, Thompston, & Davidson, 2003;Kendler, Thornton, & Gardner, 2001), early health problems (Reinherz, Giaconia, Carmola Hauf, Wasserman, & Silverman, 1999), and family patterns of depressive symptomatology (Hammen & Brennan, 2001;Reinherz, Giaconia, Carmola Hauf, Wasserman, & Paradis, 2000). Among the individual factors are a particular personality style (Burke & Haslam, 2001;Skodol, 1998), personal appraisals of events (Chang, 2000), closeness to parents and family cohesion (Kraaij et al, 2003;Reinherz et al, in press), and a ruminative response to adversity (Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000;Watkins & Teasdale, 2001). Some researchers have also attributed depression to negative self-appraisals, or to the gap between what is desired and reality (e.g., Brown, 1998).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Coping in Childhood and Adolescence for those at Risk for Depression in Emerging Adulthood

Carbonell

Reinherz

Beardslee³

2005

Child Adolesc Soc Work J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emerging adulthood is a time of great possibility and of considerable risk. This qualitative study explored the adaptation and coping strategies used over time by twenty-five emerging adults. Respondents were selected from a longitudinal community study cohort of 26-year-olds and had experienced adversity in early life. Participants mentioned using a variety of strategies, such as active evasion, seeking support, and ''letting go,'' in order to cope with difficulties. These strategies varied by context and according to respondentsÕ developmental level at the time of the adversity. Flexibility in understanding life circumstances and in choosing coping strategies to deal with specific adversities was noted as beneficial through childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood.

show abstract

“…Such strategies may be ineffective in mitigating stress by dealing with the issue itself and therefore leave youth vulnerable to further psychological stress. Similarly, Kraaij et al (2003) found that securely attached adolescents tended to employ active coping strategies, whereas insecurely attached youth used strategies such as rumination, catastrophizing, and selfblame, which are associated with negative outcomes. However, the concept of coping flexibility, as first conceptualized by Cheng (2001), refers to cases where individuals can both adapt their cognitions as well as their behaviors to fit a given situation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Genetic and personality factors are modest contributors to individual's coping styles (Jang et al 2007); however, coping in children is substantially influenced by the child's environment (Wang et al 2005) where the family context offers the avenues for social learning (Bandura 1977) of various coping strategies. For example, adolescents with a secure attachment pattern have been shown to employ more functional coping strategies than youth with insecure patterns (Kraaij et al 2003). Thus, having an understanding of the coping strategies employed by youth with EBD and how coping relates to key clinical features such as the severity of psychological difficulties can aid family therapists in their work with this vulnerable population.…”

Section: The Role Of the Family In Adolescent Distress And Copingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploration of Coping Strategies of Youth Accessing Residential and Day Treatment Programs

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Youth with emotional and behavioral disorders are often dealing with many challenges such as strained relationships, academic difficulties and family conflict in addition to their clinical symptoms. Youth can access intervention for these challenges in day and residential treatment centers. However, little is known about how these adolescents cope with stress or the strategies they use. The purpose for this study was to explore the ways youth report coping with stress, and in particular the active, passive/depressive and risky strategies they report using in response to stress. A second purpose was to explore the relationships between active, passive/depressive and risky strategies and their self-reported psychological difficulties. Using a crosssectional design, 30 adolescents (12-18 years of age, 79 % female) completed standardized measures of psychological difficulties and coping with stress. Youth reported using a variety of strategies to cope, and endorsed learning to live with it, and doing an activity alone as the two most commonly used. There were robust relationships between active (negative association) and risky behaviors (positive association) with psychological difficulties. Implications for family therapy are discussed.

show abstract

Negative Life Events and Depressive Symptoms in Late Adolescence: Bonding and Cognitive Coping as Vulnerability Factors?

Cited by 224 publications

References 19 publications

The Relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stress: Moderating Role of Social Support

The Relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Job Stress: Moderating Role of Social Support

Adaptation and Coping in Childhood and Adolescence for those at Risk for Depression in Emerging Adulthood

Exploration of Coping Strategies of Youth Accessing Residential and Day Treatment Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About