2018
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aaed88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative magnetization, dielectric and magnetodielectric properties of EuCrO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrode has little influence on the dielectric properties, which is consistent with the above conclusion. As shown in Table 1, the resistance of the grain is smaller than that of grains boundaries, which is similar to the results of reference [1].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electrode has little influence on the dielectric properties, which is consistent with the above conclusion. As shown in Table 1, the resistance of the grain is smaller than that of grains boundaries, which is similar to the results of reference [1].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The relation between physical properties and microstructure (such as grains, grain boundaries, sample-electrode interfaces, and so on) is an important aspect for ceramic materials and is helpful for better understanding their electrical properties [1][2][3][4][5]. Dielectric, modulus, and impedance measurements are the most widely used characterization methods for investigating the microstructure-property relation and relaxation mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NdCrO 3 polycrystalline ceramics were synthesized by conventional solid-state reaction. The detailed preparation process was similar to our previous work [23]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded using a PANalytical X ' pert Pro PW 3040 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the derived effective magnetic moment was~5.845 µ B /f.u., which was bigger than the theoretical one (5.3 µ B /f.u.). The difference was either due to the magnetic polarization of the Nd moments by the Cr moments or ascribed to a slight change of the susceptibility due to the crystal field splitting effects of the excited 7 F J levels [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%