Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3025171.3025222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Relevance Feedback for Exploratory Search with Visual Interactive Intent Modeling

Abstract: In difficult information seeking tasks, the majority of topranked documents for an initial query may be non-relevant, and negative relevance feedback may then help find relevant documents. Traditional negative relevance feedback has been studied on document results; we introduce a system and interface for negative feedback in a novel exploratory search setting, where continuous-valued feedback is directly given to keyword features of an inferred probabilistic user intent model. The introduced system allows bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The colour map and associated hexadecimal codes used for keyword highlighting, created using ColorBrewer (https:// colorbrewer2.org/ #type=qualitative&scheme=Set1&n=9 ). Peltonen, Belorustceva, et al, 2017;Peltonen, Strahl, et al, 2017), they generally operate as a container for saved search results or snippets, providing limited interactivity beyond adding and deleting items from the workspace, and in some cases supporting the sharing of work with others (Yue et al, 2014). While we could have done the same, we hypothesized that the visually linked keywords could also help searchers when they are re-evaluating the search results saved in the workspace.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The colour map and associated hexadecimal codes used for keyword highlighting, created using ColorBrewer (https:// colorbrewer2.org/ #type=qualitative&scheme=Set1&n=9 ). Peltonen, Belorustceva, et al, 2017;Peltonen, Strahl, et al, 2017), they generally operate as a container for saved search results or snippets, providing limited interactivity beyond adding and deleting items from the workspace, and in some cases supporting the sharing of work with others (Yue et al, 2014). While we could have done the same, we hypothesized that the visually linked keywords could also help searchers when they are re-evaluating the search results saved in the workspace.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Later, Karimzadehgan and Zhai [11] further improved the performance of negative feedback by building a more general negative topic model. Peltonen et al [19] introduced a novel search interface, where keyword features of the non-relevant results are provided to users, and they are asked for feedback on the keywords. Then a probabilistic user intent model is estimated to refine reranking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous work on negative feedback only uses result-level non-relevant information except [19], which further acquires keywordlevel feedback on non-relevant results. Although we also ask users for feedback on finer-grained information, we leverage aspect-value pairs of non-relevant results and focus on product search.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactive interfaces that enable transparent control on user models have recently become popular [35,36,2,4,42,32]. The idea behind these approaches is that, as opposite to visualizing results, the user model is visualized and the user can interactively provide feedback on the search intentions using the visualization.…”
Section: Search Results Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%