2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negatively-charged nanofiltration membrane and its hexavalent chromium removal performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we compared TFC membranes prepared in this work with some other nanofiltration membranes reported in other literature studies (Figure b). Most TFC membranes fabricated on ultrafiltration substrates or other traditional substrates show lower water permeation flux. The present membranes show relatively high water permeation flux of 16.0–21.2 L/m 2 ·h·bar and high Na 2 SO 4 rejection above 95% simultaneously, demonstrating that the TFC membranes fabricated on co-deposited MPPMs have great nanofiltration performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, we compared TFC membranes prepared in this work with some other nanofiltration membranes reported in other literature studies (Figure b). Most TFC membranes fabricated on ultrafiltration substrates or other traditional substrates show lower water permeation flux. The present membranes show relatively high water permeation flux of 16.0–21.2 L/m 2 ·h·bar and high Na 2 SO 4 rejection above 95% simultaneously, demonstrating that the TFC membranes fabricated on co-deposited MPPMs have great nanofiltration performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Journal of Chemistry ere was reported competition for the same sorption sites with metal ions by hydrogen ions at low pH values, and it is therefore suggested that the sites of adsorption on the surface of the WM are taken up by hydrogen ions (H + ), making the surface positively charged. en, the negatively charged ions HCrO4 − will approach and spontaneously access the binding sites on the adsorbent in order to pick up the more important metal ions due to the electrical attraction with the positive sites generated by the H + [28].…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, many physical, chemical, and biological treatment methods have been used to remove chromium compounds from contaminated soils, sediments, and water. Conventional methods, such as chemical precipitation [ 21 , 22 ], adsorption [ 23 , 24 ], coagulation [ 25 ], ion exchange [ 26 , 27 ], and membrane separation [ 28 , 29 ] have been used to remove chromium-containing contaminants from industrial waste. Unfortunately, most of the methods listed above are only effective in removing chromium compounds from liquid media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%