Negotiating Authority in the Ritual of the Public School Board Meeting

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how and in what way local governance of education is consequential to the work of changing public schools. The focus is on the board of education meeting as a ritual performance where authority is socially negotiated to manage the emotional and symbolic interactions that shape the district organization. Research Design: Data are drawn from 30 months of organizational fieldwork in New Haven Public Schools. Analysis is conducted on meeting transcripts, participant observer field notes, and stakeholder interviews. Findings: Observed as a ritual chain, four aspects of board of education meetings can be manipulated by those attempting to assert their authority within the organization. Organizational members used copresence, shared understandings of the ritual, emotions and symbols, and feelings of solidarity to set boundaries around the organization and maintain stability. Conclusions: Performances of organizational routines such as board meetings are consequential to the micro-level work of leading and changing education. School improvement and reform initiatives must account for the midlevel of school governance at the district and board level to make meaningful and sustainable change.

“Tell them local control is important”: A case study of democratic, community-centered school boards

“…Per this line of research, community control as described by Gutmann (2001) is considered a "myth" rather than a "societal foundation" (Smrekar & Crowson, 2015, p. 2). Multiple empirical studies document the limited or lack of democratic representation in urban, exurban, and suburban school boards DeBray et al, 2020;Diem et al, 2015;Henig et al, 2019;Kenney, 2020;Reckhow et al, 2017;Sampson, 2018;Trujillo, 2013). Much of this scholarship suggests community school boards are undemocratic, reinforcing dominant community values and reproducing inequities Diem et al, 2015); ineffectively delegating authority to central office professionals (Malen, 2003), or are obsolete as a form of local control (Henig, 2009;Scribner, 2016).…”

School Board Sensemaking of Federal and State Accountability Policies

“…Community-elected school board members do not have the same professional training, certification, or educational expertise as district leaders. Yet school boards oversee policy implementation in their districts (Kenney, 2019;Mountford, 2008) and facilitate local implementation of state accountability plans. Studies by Macartney and Singleton (2018), Trujillo (2013), and Diem et al (2015) find that board members' beliefs play significant roles in shaping policy implementation in districts.…”