2022
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2082388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating identities in western academia: an autoethnographic study of international doctoral students in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this approach, we created insiders’ accounts of how we, with shared identities as ECRs, coped with the changes and challenges of conducting research, the application of online interview methods, and the subsequent changes in our research practice it brought about, to understand the new operationalizations of online methodologies in academia during and after the pandemic. This collective autoethnographic approach allowed us to humanize and examine the processes and outcomes of our stories as insiders ethically (Lapadat, 2017) and delve into our “multiple layers of consciousness” (Ellis & Bochner, 2000, p. 739) to scrutinize “transient, nuanced and complicated lived experiences” (Li et al, 2023, p. 6). In this case, autoethnographic narratives help channelize ECRs’ voices so that other insiders (cultural members, e.g., participants, supervisors, and universities) and outsiders (cultural strangers, e.g., the wider academia) can capture a better understanding of our positioning (Ellis et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this approach, we created insiders’ accounts of how we, with shared identities as ECRs, coped with the changes and challenges of conducting research, the application of online interview methods, and the subsequent changes in our research practice it brought about, to understand the new operationalizations of online methodologies in academia during and after the pandemic. This collective autoethnographic approach allowed us to humanize and examine the processes and outcomes of our stories as insiders ethically (Lapadat, 2017) and delve into our “multiple layers of consciousness” (Ellis & Bochner, 2000, p. 739) to scrutinize “transient, nuanced and complicated lived experiences” (Li et al, 2023, p. 6). In this case, autoethnographic narratives help channelize ECRs’ voices so that other insiders (cultural members, e.g., participants, supervisors, and universities) and outsiders (cultural strangers, e.g., the wider academia) can capture a better understanding of our positioning (Ellis et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schoolchildren who take up such jobs may lose part of their education time. This extremely negotiations their educational success Li, B., Jiang, W., & Chakma, U. (2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%