Negotiating International Food Standards: The World Trade Organization's Impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission

Abstract

The article presents an empirical account of how the role, position, and perception of the intergovernmental food standardization body, Codex Alimentarius Commission, has changed after being referred to by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as the “central reference point for the elaboration of international food standards.” Both the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement and the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement include provisions that encourage WTO members to base their national regulations on international standards. The article focuses on key issues in the Codex that may have a significant impact on international food trade. The overall conclusion is that the WTO has contributed to constraining the activity and shaping the expectations of Codex members. Governments participating in Codex activities have changed their behavior after 1995 due to increased uncertainty with respect to how decisions in Codex may be binding for them under the WTO Agreements.

Governing the Global Land Grab: Multipolarity, Ideas, and Complexity in Transnational Governance

“…A growing number of studies have shown that interaction among regimes and/or clusters of institutions is deepening and producing uncertainty for actors (Raustialia and Victor, 2004). Heightened uncertainty may lead to new cooperation and coordination problems, such as constraining or chilling effects by one institution on another (Conca, 2000;Eckersley, 2004;Axelrod 2011 in Oberthur and Stokke;Veggeland and Borgen, 2005;Oberthür and Gehring, 2006) or 'spillovers' effects that can reinforce fragmentation and regime integration/ separation dynamics (Biermann et al, 2009;Johnson and Urpelainen, 2012). Uncertainty also creates opportunities for policy entrepreneurs and new ideas to enter global policy spaces that may set governance along new pathways.…”

Multilevel Union Administration

“…The agreement gives these standardization bodies a more significant role to play. This is particularly true for the Codex Alimentarius Commission, whose standards have been an issue in several WTO trade disputes (Veggeland and Borgen 2005). Since 1962, the Codex has been responsible for managing the Joint Food Standards Programme of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (FAO/WHO 1999).…”

“…WTO members can fulfil their obligations under this agreement by basing their national regulations on international standards (Veggeland and Borgen 2005). In this context, the SPS Agreement refers to three international standardization bodies: the OIE (animal health), IPPC (plant health) and Codex Alimentarius Commission (food safety).…”

Public health and carrageenan regulation: a review and analysis

“…This paper reviews the history of carrageenan from the time that it began to be industrially manufactured for food use in the US to the present. While differences still exist, there has been a growing move in recent years towards international harmonisation of food 4 regulation through the Codex Alimentarius system and the EU Commission (Garrett et al, 1998;Livermore, 2006;Millstone et al, 2002;Veggeland et al, 2005).…”