2014
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x14523925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating mental health rehabilitation plans: Joint future talk and clashing time talk in professional client interaction

Abstract: Abstract:This article explores how discourses of time are produced and negotiated in professional client interaction when making mental health rehabilitation plans. The discourse of linear time is dominant in interaction, and shared by both participants to create joint future talk. However, the clients might challenge the dominant time talk by using the discourse of the time of mindful body, resulting in clashing time talk. The discourses of time are linked with identity categorisation, and with the criteria o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…How social workers talk about and with service users is by no means irrelevant; it is a discursive action wherein the service users are constructed. Thus, for professionals as well as service users, to have an aware discussion on terms and the categories they bring the joint work to resist and counter stigma in mental health found in category the ordinary but eccentric would then have a greater chance to be advanced (Juhila, Günther, & Raitakari, 2015). As such, that could also increase the possibility for service user organisations to have a more viable part in collaboration, in that their categories and counter-discourse becomes more visible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How social workers talk about and with service users is by no means irrelevant; it is a discursive action wherein the service users are constructed. Thus, for professionals as well as service users, to have an aware discussion on terms and the categories they bring the joint work to resist and counter stigma in mental health found in category the ordinary but eccentric would then have a greater chance to be advanced (Juhila, Günther, & Raitakari, 2015). As such, that could also increase the possibility for service user organisations to have a more viable part in collaboration, in that their categories and counter-discourse becomes more visible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service user organisations represent a reaction against being labelled, and offer a counter-discourse to both the professional and the marketoriented discourses (McDonald, 2006), thus giving an alternative construction of the service user. This would also be one of the goals of social work: that together with the service users to promote identity categories that contain strength and capacity to solve their problems (Juhila, Günther, and Raitakari 2015). Swedish service user organisations, on their official Internet sites, refer to their members mostly as 'people who/with … ', and more seldom or not at all as 'service users', 'clients', or 'patients'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the professionals' and clients' views may just as well differ on 'what the case at hand is', and this often causes difficulties in the client-practitioner relationship, even the client's exclusion from the services. (see also Juhila et al 2014a and2014b. ) In current research and practice, 21 shared understanding, client involvement and decision-making are stressed as pivotal to effective and ethical treatment and rehabilitation (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no explicit references to developmentalism are provided in this case, the assessment still points to an incapability of following linear progressive development and expectations of normality (Fahlgren, 2009;Juhila et al, 2015).…”
Section: Chronicity and Fixitymentioning
confidence: 99%