Negotiating Statist Islam: Fatwa and State Policy in Singapore

Abstract

This article examines how state-linked religious actors negotiate religious demands in a secular authoritarian state. There is a prevalent assumption that such religious actors lack the agency to affect state decisions. I do not seek to challenge that proposition, rather to qualify it by identifying the scope and extent of their authority. Taking the state as an autonomous actor, I examine fatwas or official religious edicts in Singapore through the lens of ‘policy feedback’, which analyses how the bureaucratisation of religious institution created new legal and bureaucratic channels that shape state policies. This paper aims to primarily answer the following question: What role do fatwas play in shaping statist interpretation of religion? I answer this by looking at the historical development of religious bureaucracy in Singapore – which includes the fatwa institution – and analysing the role of fatwas in relation to state policies. I argue that the bureaucratisation of religion not only regulates religious demands, but creates a juncture for religious institutions to inform and contest statist version of Islam though policy feedback, a concept that has thus far been only partially applied to economic issues. Policy feedback explains how religious demands are negotiated at the bureaucratic level and is particularly instructive in clarifying the discourse between the state and the fatwa institutions, which underlines that the policies and programmes of the autonomous state can be influenced by the very demands of religious bureaucrats. This paper also introduces Statist Islam as an original concept with which to conceptualise the amalgamation of statist and religious interests, and considers how the informal authority of fatwas continues to function beyond the legal and bureaucratic restrictions set by the state.

The fiqh of disaster: The mitigation of Covid-19 in the perspective of Islamic education-neuroscience

“…Meanwhile, they should have strengthened and supported government institutions [ 68 ] including religious provisions from the authority. In Singapore, for example, although religious institutions do not have a role in policy formulation, religious authority holders also support government policies [ 69 ] including in Covid-19 mitigation.…”

Contesting Ethnic and Religious Identities in the 2019 Indonesian Elections: Political Polarization in West Kalimantan

“…Public policy discussions focused on infrastructure, forest res, and the Freeport Mine in Papua. Finally, the discussion of social justice and welfare issues dealt predominantly with the dominance of ethnic minorities in Indonesia's private and public enterprises (IPAC 2019;Pasuni 2018).…”

Discrimination among Ethnic Minorities Groups in Singapore

“…The question is where is the role of MUIS to distribute the aspiration of the Muslim community in Singapore? According to Pasuni (2018), to be accomplished by statelinked religious actors, negotiating religious demands in a secular authoritarian state is very weak. There is a prevailing perception that the department lacks certain religious actors to control state decisions.…”

“…Policy input illustrates how at the bureaucratic level religious demands are negotiated and are particularly instructive in clarifying the dialogue between the state and the fatwa institutions, which underlines that the independent state's strategies and programs may be impacted by the very demands of religious bureaucracy. Statist Islam is an original idea with which the convergence of statistical and religious interests can be conceptualized and how the informal jurisdiction of fatwas continues to exist outside the legal and institutional limits imposed by the state (Nasir, 2018;Pasuni, 2018).…”