2020
DOI: 10.1177/0042098020959011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbourhood and school effects on educational inequalities in the transition from primary to secondary education in Amsterdam

Abstract: Drawing on an advanced analysis of individual longitudinal register data of school careers of four cohorts of children in Amsterdam, this article suggests that school advice is highly differentiated between children of different migrant and socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, apart from these individual characteristics, we demonstrate that the socioeconomic composition of neighbourhoods and schools is important for understanding differences in school advice. The analysis shows that neighbourhood and school so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the social composition of the attended school and the neighbourhood characteristics have a stronger effect on student mobility patterns.What these results show is that high choice of schools (as in the case of Barcelona) does not translate automatically into higher levels of mobility. Distance travelled to school is mediated by the educational and social contexts of the areas where students reside.6 | DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONResearch has provided significant evidence on how unequal geographies of educational supply and demand interact to produce different choice opportunities and different student mobility patterns(Burgess et al, 2017;Kuyvenhoven & Boterman, 2020;Oberti & Savina, 2019). This body of evidence has challenged the supposed virtues of open enrolment policies, and it has highlighted the difficulties in balancing school choice and equity (OECD, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the social composition of the attended school and the neighbourhood characteristics have a stronger effect on student mobility patterns.What these results show is that high choice of schools (as in the case of Barcelona) does not translate automatically into higher levels of mobility. Distance travelled to school is mediated by the educational and social contexts of the areas where students reside.6 | DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONResearch has provided significant evidence on how unequal geographies of educational supply and demand interact to produce different choice opportunities and different student mobility patterns(Burgess et al, 2017;Kuyvenhoven & Boterman, 2020;Oberti & Savina, 2019). This body of evidence has challenged the supposed virtues of open enrolment policies, and it has highlighted the difficulties in balancing school choice and equity (OECD, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to critically consider how the hegemonic school culture may create otherness among those who do not fit the local ideal. While Finland, Iceland and the Netherlands may be generally perceived as supporting egalitarian and meritocratic educational systems, there are clear indications that in these settings inequality is on the rise (Bernelius and Vilkama, 2019; Dovemark et al, 2018; Kuyvenhoven and Boterman, 2020). Considering these processes, future research on inclusive education can benefit from socio-politically informed, micro-level intersectional studies on disadvantage and marginalisation that remain reflexive regarding schemes of categorisation and/or classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggests that there are localised differences in neighbourhood disadvantage, which are associated with relative FFD, but not captured by the sub-district level disadvantage classification. These localised differences may be explained by residential and school segregation, for example ( 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%