1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1967.tb00035.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbourhood knowledge and the distribution of marriage distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that a lack of potential mates within a community will be satisfied primarily by an increase in local migration. This makes intuitive sense, since individuals searching for a mate outside of their own community will tend to find mates within a local area, as predicted by the neighborhood knowledge model of Boyce et al (1967), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding suggests that a lack of potential mates within a community will be satisfied primarily by an increase in local migration. This makes intuitive sense, since individuals searching for a mate outside of their own community will tend to find mates within a local area, as predicted by the neighborhood knowledge model of Boyce et al (1967), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To take this aspect of human behavior in account, we sorted the married couples (and therefore the children) of each generation in the order of the husband's sibship number. This kept brothers (as well as cousins) together in the same neighborhoods in accordance with the pattern of patrilocal settling common among pastoral and feudal societies [Strickberger, 19681. The model could have incorporated one of a number of possible complex equations [Wright, 1951;Kimura and Weiss, 1964;Boyce et al, 1967;Cavalli-Sforza and Bodmer, 1971;Henneberg, 19791 to determine which member of the opposite sex in a person's immediate vicinity this person was likely to marry, if any. In contrast, our "neighborhoods" were defined as a number of sibships on either side of the individual's sibship whose members of the opposite sex are all equally available for marriage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 192 marital pairs were grouped into one of three categories. The first category is composed of those marital pairs in which both partners gave Ramea RESULTS Boyce et al (1967). It is of interest to point out that this similarity obtains in spite of the fact that Ramea can be considered to be more economically attractive than either of the two locations used in this comparison.…”
Section: Marital Movementmentioning
confidence: 96%