2015
DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2015.1076566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neither Villains Nor Victims: Towards an Educational Perspective on Radicalisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hutson et al [19] concluded that in the Middle East, males between 15 and 25 years old are more likely than any other demographic group to engage in terrorism or political violence. In a large part of the literature on Islamic extremism, radicalization is linked to the adolescent phase [7]. According to Silber and Bhatt [6], the radicalization process can be distinguished in four phases: (1) pre-radicalization, (2) self-identification, (3) indoctrination and (4) jihadization.…”
Section: Level Of Education Of Radicalized Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutson et al [19] concluded that in the Middle East, males between 15 and 25 years old are more likely than any other demographic group to engage in terrorism or political violence. In a large part of the literature on Islamic extremism, radicalization is linked to the adolescent phase [7]. According to Silber and Bhatt [6], the radicalization process can be distinguished in four phases: (1) pre-radicalization, (2) self-identification, (3) indoctrination and (4) jihadization.…”
Section: Level Of Education Of Radicalized Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceiving of those who are considered susceptible to radicalisation in terms of vulnerable victims is problematic. Based on an analysis of the perspectives presented by young radicals themselves, Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and de Winter (2015) argue that neither a view of these young people as victims or villains sufficiently accounts for the views expressed by these young people. The perspective of vulnerable victim does not take sufficient account of the agency demonstrated by many of these young people in the choices they made (Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and de Winter 2015;Furedi 2009;Richards 2011).…”
Section: The Resilient Response: a Question Of Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an analysis of the perspectives presented by young radicals themselves, Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and de Winter (2015) argue that neither a view of these young people as victims or villains sufficiently accounts for the views expressed by these young people. The perspective of vulnerable victim does not take sufficient account of the agency demonstrated by many of these young people in the choices they made (Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and de Winter 2015;Furedi 2009;Richards 2011). This perspective can diminish the fact that some individuals may choose to align themselves with groups espousing violence, not because they are vulnerable but because they see it as a potential solution to real challenges or problems.…”
Section: The Resilient Response: a Question Of Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and De Winter (2015: 332) highlight however, there are some concerns with characterising young people with 'radicalised sympathies' in totalising ways as either 'victims' or 'villains'. The significant challenge here is that when young people are viewed as 'victim' an important understanding of the agency and commitment of individuals can be neglected (Sieckelinck, Kaulingfreks, and De Winter, 2015). Similarly, when young people with radical sympathies are viewed as 'villains' (real or potential), the educational relationship between teacher and student becomes blurred, carrying with it the danger that it collapses into surveillance in a way that might undermine trust, care and compassion.…”
Section: Australian Values: Securitisation and Westernisation?mentioning
confidence: 99%