2016
DOI: 10.12816/0031646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nematodes Community Infecting Chalcides Ocellatus Lizard and Their Relation to Some Environmental and Biological Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, others reported some species from reptilian hosts, C. zugi Bursey et al (2005) isolated from large intestine of ring-tailed gecko Cyrtodactylus louisiadensis in Papua, New Guinea; C. leytensis Bursey et al (2015) from large intestine of bent-toed gecko Cyrtodactylus gubaot in Philippines. Hassan (2016) in Egypt detected C. vrcibradici from Chalicides ocellatus that was similar to the present nematode in host type and infection site.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, others reported some species from reptilian hosts, C. zugi Bursey et al (2005) isolated from large intestine of ring-tailed gecko Cyrtodactylus louisiadensis in Papua, New Guinea; C. leytensis Bursey et al (2015) from large intestine of bent-toed gecko Cyrtodactylus gubaot in Philippines. Hassan (2016) in Egypt detected C. vrcibradici from Chalicides ocellatus that was similar to the present nematode in host type and infection site.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…By comparing the present parasite with other species of same genus, but from different hosts, the only morphologically related species was C. vrcibradici (Bursey and Goldberg, 2004). Also, this genus was closely related to C. vrcibradici (Hassan, 2016) as sharing the same host and geographic area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in several geographical regions both genera are found cohabiting the same host (e.g. Martin and Roca, 2004, 2005; Roca et al ., 2005; Carretero et al , 2006; Hassan, 2016). Morphologically, both genera exhibit differences in the posterior end of the body and egg shape upon egg deposition (Adamson, 1981; Bursey and Goldberg, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%