2018
DOI: 10.1112/blms.12198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Némethi's division algorithm for zeta-functions of plumbed 3-manifolds

Abstract: A polynomial counterpart of the Seiberg–Witten invariant associated with a negative definite plumbing 3‐manifold has been proposed by earlier work of the authors. It is provided by a special decomposition of the zeta‐function defined by the combinatorics of the manifold. In this article we give an algorithm, based on multivariable Euclidean division of the zeta‐function, for the explicit calculation of the polynomial, in particular for the Seiberg–Witten invariant.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though this connection suggested the existence of a 'polynomial -negative degree part' decomposition of multivariable topological Poincaré series, hence a polynomial generalization of the Seiberg-Witten invariant, and it generated an intense activity (see e.g. [LN14,LSz16,LSz17]), the complete explanation waited till the present manuscript.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though this connection suggested the existence of a 'polynomial -negative degree part' decomposition of multivariable topological Poincaré series, hence a polynomial generalization of the Seiberg-Witten invariant, and it generated an intense activity (see e.g. [LN14,LSz16,LSz17]), the complete explanation waited till the present manuscript.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It satisfied (c), but it didn't answer (a) in a natural way. Later, [LSz17] considered another polynomial P + 2 (with P + 2 = P + 1 in general) constructed via an inductive multivariable Euclidean division. It answered (a)-(b), but (c) was not established, so it was not clear if P + 2 is helpful at all in pc (or Seiberg-Witten) computations.…”
Section: This On the Taylor Expansion Level Transforms Into The Symmementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation