2016
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azw010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neo-democracy: ‘Useful Idiot’ of Neo-liberalism?

Abstract: This article explores a possible link between 'neo-democratic' states (the subject of a recent book by the author) and the underlying politico-economic ideology of our post-1989 world, neoliberalism. Taking the UK and the US as examples, it argues that the shift in our way of looking at the world that neo-liberalism represents involves a forsaking of many of the assumptions of the social democratic polity of the 20 th century. However this is not a leap into an unknown future so much as it is a return to a par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far as the states are concerned, there has been a temptation to deploy the emergency powers designed to counter terrorism so as to curb dissent against the havoc caused by the imposition of harsh, austerity-based policies. 101 The EU has not had the capacity (and surely not had the inclination) to engage in the same level of repressive control, much less follow the logic of liberal authoritarianism into true coercion: 'European economic and monetary crisis management has not yet resorted to banning political parties or relied on marauding black shirts, aggressive storm troopers, the removal of unwanted people or the shutdown of constitutional courts'. 102 The engaged citizen is caught in a bind: 'While resistance against EU policies is pointless at home, it is largely homeless in the Union'.…”
Section: The Neo-liberal Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far as the states are concerned, there has been a temptation to deploy the emergency powers designed to counter terrorism so as to curb dissent against the havoc caused by the imposition of harsh, austerity-based policies. 101 The EU has not had the capacity (and surely not had the inclination) to engage in the same level of repressive control, much less follow the logic of liberal authoritarianism into true coercion: 'European economic and monetary crisis management has not yet resorted to banning political parties or relied on marauding black shirts, aggressive storm troopers, the removal of unwanted people or the shutdown of constitutional courts'. 102 The engaged citizen is caught in a bind: 'While resistance against EU policies is pointless at home, it is largely homeless in the Union'.…”
Section: The Neo-liberal Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%