Neo‐developmentalism and a “vía campesina” for rural development: Unreconciled projects in Ecuador's Citizen's Revolution

Abstract

From the outside, it appears that the government of President Rafael Correa in Ecuador has put in place a legal and policy framework for a vía campesina model of rural development, inspired by food sovereignty and buen vivir. Recent studies have, however, concluded that a considerable disjuncture exists between this framework and the actual agricultural policies and programmes implemented by the government. In this paper, I provide a broad overview of the agricultural and rural development policies under the Correa government and analyse some of the causes of the gap between the policy framework and policy implementation. I argue that Ecuador under Correa speaks to the difficulties of reconciling a vía campesina approach to rural development with a neo‐developmental economic model. I focus on several issues in particular in order to explain the disjuncture: how the growth of “vía campesina” proposals and political discourse in Ecuador since the 1980s coincided with significant processes of agrarian change; the transformation of rural social movement federations from a sociopolitical force into a political/electoral force and the subsequent decline of these movements; and the deepening integration of small‐scale producers into domestic agribusiness commodity chains and the growth of national agribusiness firms during the Correa government.

Agrarian social movements: The absurdly difficult but not impossible agenda of defeating right‐wing populism and exploring a socialist future

“…This is a double‐edge sword, depending on specific context, because the agendas of agrarian movements can be, and have been, vulnerable to co‐optation by the establishment they detest or by other populist groups, left wing, or right wing. There are ample examples of this in Latin America's “pink tide” countries where food sovereignty has been enshrined in the constitution or in national governmental policies but interpreted in ways that contradict social movements' understanding, such as the incorporation of food sovereignty into the broader buen vivir platforms, funded, ironically, through neoextractivism (see Andrade, ; Clark, ; Giunta, ; Henderson, ; McKay, Nehring, & Walsh‐Dilley, ; Vergara‐Camus & Kay, ). The Zero Budget Natural Farming movement founded by Subhash Palekar in India has gained much momentum, praise, and support from Prime Minister Modi, but its awkward or even troubling overlap with the right‐wing Hindu nationalist current poses difficult challenges and dilemmas even for its supporters from among the organized progressive agrarian populists.…”

Trajectories of Vulnerability of Rural Territories in the Ecuadorian Andes: a Comparative Analysis

“…The example of the Victoria del Portete parish is also interesting because it reveals that despite a renewal of the political discourse in Ecuador, the project led by Rafael Correa has reproduced for the national primary sector an economic pattern comparable to that of the last decades (Acosta and Cajas Guijarro, 2016;Villalba-Eguiluz and Etxano, 2017). In the end, the direction taken by the former Ecuadorian president helped to prolong the trajectory of vulnerability of the Andean family farmers, since beyond the province of Azuay alone, multiple mining projects affected the farming communities of the Ecuadorian Sierra (Latorre, 2015), and few major steps have been taken to change an agricultural model that values intensive crops, especially those for export (Martinez Godoy, 2015 andClark, 2017;Martínez, 2017).…”

Ecuador: fomento productivo e industrial bajo la Revolución Ciudadana, un ensayo en clave posneoliberal

“…Por esto, y pese a la retórica gubernamental sobre la revolución agraria, la apuesta estatal fue por una reforma de alcances muy modestos, centrada en la titulación de tierras bajo posesión informal y en un programa de compra de tierras con apoyo de crédito gubernamental, mediante el Plan de Fomento del Acceso a Tierras de los Productores Familiares en el Ecuador (Plan Tierras). En suma, diferentes investigaciones (Clark, 2017;Houtart y Laforge, 2016) reconocen que la Revolución Ciudadana podría haber ido mucho más lejos, implementando una estrategia que articulara las medidas arriba expuestas con políticas de promoción de la pequeña y mediana agricultura familiar y campesina mediante el mejor acceso a recursos productivos (tierra, agua, asesoría técnica, etc.) y con una orientación agroecológica por parte del Magap, en aras de mejorar las condiciones productivas y de comercialización bajo las cuales ese tipo de unidades de producción ofertan su alta diversidad de productos a la economía nacional.…”