2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic continental evolution and tectonic history of the North China Craton: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
145
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 439 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
145
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1a) forming during several tectonic cycles (e.g., Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Lu et al, 2008;Zhai et al, 2010;Zhao and Zhai, 2013). It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed. Zhai et al (2000Zhai et al ( , 2005Zhai et al ( , 2010 proposed that the NCC can be divided into several microblocks connected by greenstone belts and granites and were amalgamated at the end of the Neoarchean (∼2.5 Ga).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a) forming during several tectonic cycles (e.g., Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Lu et al, 2008;Zhai et al, 2010;Zhao and Zhai, 2013). It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed. Zhai et al (2000Zhai et al ( , 2005Zhai et al ( , 2010 proposed that the NCC can be divided into several microblocks connected by greenstone belts and granites and were amalgamated at the end of the Neoarchean (∼2.5 Ga).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed. Zhai et al (2000Zhai et al ( , 2005Zhai et al ( , 2010 proposed that the NCC can be divided into several microblocks connected by greenstone belts and granites and were amalgamated at the end of the Neoarchean (∼2.5 Ga). Zhao (2001) initially proposed that the NCC formed by amalgamation of the Eastern and Western Blocks along the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO; Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the NCC is mainly characterized by a Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic basement [57][58][59][60]. The Late Paleoproterozoic (1.8 Ga) and Neoarchean (2.5 Ga) detrital zircon age clusters of the lower Yanchang Formation may ultimately match that of the basement rocks of the NCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two different models to explain time of final amalgamation of NCC. Some researchers believed that the NCC formed by assembling of several micro-continental blocks at ~2.50 Ga [5][6][7][8], whereas others proposed that the final collision of NCC occurred at ~1.85 Ga [9,10]. Conventional, the final amalgamation and cratonization of the NCC was considered to be related to the Lüliang movement at the late Paleoproterozoic (~1.8 Ga) [11], which are characterized by unconformity between the Paleo-Mesoproterozoic sedimentary strata and metamorphosed Archean basement in different regions.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhai et al [5,6] suggested that the NCC divided into six blocks and they were joined into the NCC at ~2.5 Ga, following by Paleoproterozoic rifting-subductionaccretion-collision tectonics and subsequent high-grade granulite facies metamorphism-granitoid magmatism during ca. 2.0-1.82 [63].…”
Section: Early Precambrian Tectonic Evolution Of the Nccmentioning
confidence: 99%