When contemporary feminist movement made its initial presence felt in the academy there was both an ongoing critique of conventional classroom dynamics and an attempt to create alternative pedagogical strategies.' (hooks, 1994:180). Feminist academic work is a challenge to traditional academic expectations. It tends to '…problematise traditional constructions of the academy.' (Leathwood and Hey, 2009:436) and '…has challenged the university with regard to everything from institutional practices like admissions to issues of curriculum and pedagogy.' (Bondy et al., 2015:3). Consequently, its development is not always supported (Weiler, 1995; Woodward & Woodward, 2009). In addition, power relations in educational settings tend to mean that it gets marginalised (De Welde et al., 2013). This situation poses a challenge to the feminist teacher, but not one that is insurmountable, as in my practice; I have always found ways to imbue my teaching with my feminist values, despite managerialist practices in current universities that diminish teacher autonomy (Preston and Aslett, 2014; Gill and Donaghue, 2015). I take inspiration in this endeavour from others who seek to challenge sexism and other forms of discrimination in higher education settings. For example, the Women in Higher Education Management (WHEM) Network, an international feminist research forum that aims to support women in higher education management to succeed (Whemnetwork.com, 2016). Like feminism, feminist pedagogy is not a monolithic and unitary concept; rather it is a movable, tractable and dynamic practice. There are multiple feminisms and multiple feminist pedagogies. Feminist pedagogies are diverse and multifaceted in nature with core goals of emancipation and liberation underpinning what is taught and how it is taught (Storrs and Mihelich, 1998). It is crucial to acknowledge that 'feminist pedagogy does not assume that all classrooms are alike.' (Shrewsbury, 1997:172), and the feminist classroom is a rich ecology rather than a monoculture (Coia and Taylor, 2013). This means that: ' …assuming a singular meaning to feminist pedagogy is … problematic. Just as there are multiple feminisms, so there are multiple feminist pedagogies-for example, anti-racist feminist pedagogies, liberal feminist pedagogies, socialist feminist pedagogies, queer pedagogies, and intersectional feminist pedagogies.' (Briskin, 2015: 66).