2015
DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n2s1p9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nepotism as a Negative Factor in Organization Performance

Abstract: Nepotism in the work place has its pro and contra. In this paper nepotism it will be seen as a negative factor in the organization performance, although there are different opinions that nepotism not always has a negative impact for the organization performance. To prove this a research has been done in some companies from Dukagjini Region. Nepotism in itself is not considered a bad think if the companies hire qualified people but the research shows that nepotism in Kosovo companies is a negative factor and as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…India with the huge workforce and global VUCA challenges (volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous)areconcentratingonlocalbusinessesi.e.SMEsinthemanufacturingandservicesector (Yoshinoetal.,2016;HarvieandCharoenrat,2015;Das,2007;MenkhoffandKay,2000).Hence,the roleofthemanagerasaleaderisimperativeinaligningtheworkforcetotheorganizationalchanges (Dubeyetal.,2017;BostonConsultingGroup,2013).TogetholdsonVUCAchallenges,thereisa significantneedforindividualswhogeneticallybelongtothesamefamilytobeloyal,committed, andreadytoacceptchallengestoexpandthefamilybusiness (CarriganandBuckley,2008;Lokaj, 2015). TheLMXtheoryconsidersthein-groupmemberstobeloyal,trustworthy,andhaveastrong visiontowardsorganizationalsustainability(SiyalandPeng,2018;GraenandWakabayashi,1994;Dasborough,2009).Thesein-groupindividualsreceivedhighsocialexchangefromtheleader,they havehighrespectforseniorfamilymembers,theirlifeachievementsarethesourceofinspirationfor themsuchwillenhanceentrepreneurialzealandmakethemmoreconscioustowardsorganizational sustainability (HudsonandClaasen,2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…India with the huge workforce and global VUCA challenges (volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous)areconcentratingonlocalbusinessesi.e.SMEsinthemanufacturingandservicesector (Yoshinoetal.,2016;HarvieandCharoenrat,2015;Das,2007;MenkhoffandKay,2000).Hence,the roleofthemanagerasaleaderisimperativeinaligningtheworkforcetotheorganizationalchanges (Dubeyetal.,2017;BostonConsultingGroup,2013).TogetholdsonVUCAchallenges,thereisa significantneedforindividualswhogeneticallybelongtothesamefamilytobeloyal,committed, andreadytoacceptchallengestoexpandthefamilybusiness (CarriganandBuckley,2008;Lokaj, 2015). TheLMXtheoryconsidersthein-groupmemberstobeloyal,trustworthy,andhaveastrong visiontowardsorganizationalsustainability(SiyalandPeng,2018;GraenandWakabayashi,1994;Dasborough,2009).Thesein-groupindividualsreceivedhighsocialexchangefromtheleader,they havehighrespectforseniorfamilymembers,theirlifeachievementsarethesourceofinspirationfor themsuchwillenhanceentrepreneurialzealandmakethemmoreconscioustowardsorganizational sustainability (HudsonandClaasen,2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadershipestablishesasharedvision,strategy,anddirectionforalong-termsustainablefuture (Opoku etal.,2015).Theleader-memberexchangetheorydiscussesthesuperiorandsubordinaterelationship underthetwoaspectsasin-groupmembersandout-groupmembers (Rosenetal.,2011;Aggarwal etal.,2020)in-groupmembershavehigh-qualityexchangeswiththeleader,thatincludesupport, trustandfrequentinteractions (Kimura,2013),theywouldbegivenchallengingtasksandincreased autonomy (TseandTroth,2013).Out-groupmembers,ontheotherhand,receivelittlesupportfrom theleader,haverestrictedaccesstoknowledge,andhavefewerprospectsforempowerment (Rosenet al,2011).Nepotismisthepracticeofgivingrelativesandfriendsofthefamilypreferentialtreatment as in-group members in the workplace (Lokaj, 2015).Practices of nepotism are still prevalent in developingcountriessmallbusinesssustainability (Chanetal.,2020;Boadi,2000;Hayajenhetal., 1994).The preferred reason is mutual respect (Carrigan and Buckley,2008), shared vision, sense ofbelonging,trustandeconomy (CarriganandBuckley,2008),thedesiretopursueandshapethe company'sgoalforthebenefitoffuturegenerationsofthefamily (Chrismanetal.,1999).…”
Section: Leader-member Exchange and Nepotismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kayırmacılık, yöneticilerin sahip oldukları güç kaynaklarını kullanarak biyolojik veya sosyal bağa sahip oldukları akrabalarına, arkadaşlarına veya sisyasi yandaşlarına; işe alma, terfi, işlem, ödül, disiplin, ücret, ceza veya işten çıkarmada imtiyaz gösterilmesi olarak tanımlanabilmektedir (Akuffo ve Kivipold, 2019;Büte, 2011a;Lokaj, 2015;Oktay, 1983;Özkanan ve Erdem, 2014;Vveinhardt ve Sroko, 2020). Bu imtiyazlar diğer çalışanlar tarafından kötünün iyiye tercih edilmesi veya liyakatsiz kişilerin kritik pozisyonlara getirilmesi olarak algılanabilmekte ve yöneticilerin yapmış olduğu kayırmacı eylemler örgütün tamamına atfedilebilmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…For a long time, the Western world has been of the opinion that various forms of corruption are characteristic of the third world and developing countries or that corruption is the product of over-regulated countries without the free market [10]. In fact, research shows that in developed countries, selection for job vacancies is made on the basis of the candidate's education, merits, qualifications, work experience, while in developing countries family members and relatives rather than competent individuals are likely to be employed, and therefore their performance is not as good as it should be [2,4,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%