2004
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nerve excitability properties in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

Abstract: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) is commonly considered a prototype of a hereditary demyelinating polyneuropathy. Apart from the myelin involvement, there has been little information on axonal membrane properties in this condition. Taking advantage of the uniform nature of the disease process, we undertook the in vivo assessment of multiple axonal excitability properties at the median nerve in nine CMT1A patients with PMP22 (peripheral myelin protein 22) gene duplication and 53 controls. The thresho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
4
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
37
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The nerve excitability changes in these patients did not correspond to those previously described for membrane depolarization or hyperpolarization [6], for demyelination in CMT1A [18], or for block of sodium channels [9]. While alteration in neuromuscular transmission may alter recovery cycle measures, it is unlikely to cause the prominent changes in threshold electrotonus, the major finding of this study, which assesses local changes underlying the stimulating electrode.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The nerve excitability changes in these patients did not correspond to those previously described for membrane depolarization or hyperpolarization [6], for demyelination in CMT1A [18], or for block of sodium channels [9]. While alteration in neuromuscular transmission may alter recovery cycle measures, it is unlikely to cause the prominent changes in threshold electrotonus, the major finding of this study, which assesses local changes underlying the stimulating electrode.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…33,35 Electrophysiologically, conduction blocks characterize CIDP, whereas in MAG/SGPG-N conduction block is rarely observed. MAG/SGPG-N and hereditary sensorimotor neuropathy type 1 (HMSN1) have similar demyelinating features on nerve conduction studies and a slow progressive course, 26 although they can usually be distinguished clinically by the predominance of sensory symptoms and older age of onset of MAG/ SGPG-N compared to HMSN1. 3,9 HMSN1A is the most common subtype of HMSN1 and is caused by mutations in the gene encoding for peripheral myelin protein 22 , whereas HMSN1B results from genetic abnormalities in myelin protein zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy in establishing the diagnosis in CMT1A and GBS is related, in part, to the appropriate application of electrodiagnostic techniques. Using a noninvasive technique of threshold tracking, the indices of the axonal excitability, such as threshold electrotonus, strength-duration time constants, rheobases and recovery cycles can now be measured in healthy subjects and patients with GBS and CMT1A [6][7][8]. These indices depend on the biophysical properties of the axonal membrane and myelin sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%