SVGs from the procedures has been suspected. 6 A no-touch (NT) technique preserving PVAT to minimize the damage of SVGs at the time of collection was reported years ago. 7 Clinical and histological data have been accumulated until now. 8-11 A study of the longest observation showed that patency of SVGs using the NT technique was comparable with that of thoracic artery grafts after 16 years. 12 However, the physiological function of SVGs before use for CABG has not been fully investigated so far. The study was sought to compare SVGs collected by using either the CON or NT techniques and a myograph. We hypnotized that the technique for harvesting SVGs could affect the functions of grafts associated with durability. C oronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for ischemic heart disease is a major surgical procedure, and approximately 50 years have passed since CABG using a saphenous vein graft (SVG) was first reported. 1 Nevertheless, these grafts are still widely used because of their several advantages, including ease of access, ease of operation, sufficiency of length for transplantation, and short harvest time. In the conventional (CON) technique, SVG is harvested by removing perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT), and subsequently expanding it by saline and high pressure. These processes are intended to secure graft flow. Nonetheless, the CON SVGs have low patency rates and poor clinical outcomes relative to arterial grafts. 2-5 Damage of