2015 30th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2015
DOI: 10.1109/lics.2015.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested Weighted Automata

Abstract: Recently there has been a significant effort to handle quantitative properties in formal verification and synthesis. While weighted automata over finite and infinite words provide a natural and flexible framework to express quantitative properties, perhaps surprisingly, some basic system properties such as average response time cannot be expressed using weighted automata, nor in any other know decidable formalism. In this work, we introduce nested weighted automata as a natural extension of weighted automata w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weighted automata have found applications in speech and language processing [16], and they have been extended for modeling systems and verifying quantitative properties of these systems [17]. The studied models for the latter purpose include Nested Weighted Automata [18], a two-level variant of weighted automata for infinite strings. The computational problems that are relevant for quantitative verification are analysis questions such as universality and equivalence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighted automata have found applications in speech and language processing [16], and they have been extended for modeling systems and verifying quantitative properties of these systems [17]. The studied models for the latter purpose include Nested Weighted Automata [18], a two-level variant of weighted automata for infinite strings. The computational problems that are relevant for quantitative verification are analysis questions such as universality and equivalence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, instead of rejecting the implementation, one can quantify the distance between a measured trace and the specification. Among all implementations that violate a specification, the closer the implementation traces are to the specification, the better [6,8,13]. The edit distance problem is also the basis for repairing specifications [2,3].The TED problem answers a fine-grained question with a fixed bound on the number of edit operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%