2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4901292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nets, tiles, and metal-organic frameworks

Abstract: An account is given of the basic nets that are important in the description and design of metal-organic framework (MOF) structures. These are generally of minimal transitivity, a concept which is explained. Derived nets are defined and the advantages of using derived nets to describe the topology of MOF frameworks with multiple branch points are emphasized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] By virtue of their building-block structure and the large number of potential components, the number of MOFs is potentially limitless. [21][22][23][24][25] Further modifications to MOF chemistry can be achieved by introducing functional groups, substituting different metals, and by mixing metals and/or linkers. [26][27][28] Despite these many possibilities, a relatively small fraction of MOFs have been synthesized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] By virtue of their building-block structure and the large number of potential components, the number of MOFs is potentially limitless. [21][22][23][24][25] Further modifications to MOF chemistry can be achieved by introducing functional groups, substituting different metals, and by mixing metals and/or linkers. [26][27][28] Despite these many possibilities, a relatively small fraction of MOFs have been synthesized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 7 MOFs are crystalline materials formed by the self-assembly of inorganic metal clusters and organic linkers. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 By virtue of their building-block structure and the large number of potential components, the number of MOFs is potentially limitless. 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Further modifications to MOF chemistry can be achieved by introducing functional groups, substituting different metals, and by mixing metals and/or linkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the PRINCEPS output summarized in Table 4, all four sites in CeNi 4 Si finds their best matches in the reference phase CeNi 5 , with high projection qualities (higher than 80% for all sites, 99% for Ce1). This also results in an overall decomposition weight of nearly 100% on CeNi 5 , and a very high decomposition quality of 91.64%. The combination of one predominant decomposition component and high decomposition quality is the typical result for a ternary variant of a binary or elemental reference phase.…”
Section: Ceni 4 Si: An Ordered Ternary Variant Of a Binary Structurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…A well-devised description of a crystal structure not only highlights its structural features, but also provides insight into its bonding, electronic structure, and physical properties. However, a successful structural description is not always easy to achieve: while for certain materials, such as oxides and metal-organic frameworks, our chemical understanding is deep enough that their structural units can be easily identified, for other materials it can be far more challenging [4,5]. Among crystalline phases, the structures of intermetallic compounds are particularly difficult to analyze: they exhibit a vast and intriguing structural diversity [6,7], but the lack of a clear bonding picture for most phases creates ambiguities as one tries to make sense of this diversity through structural descriptions [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now move to a different but useful concept, which is the transitivity of a net [21,22]. If we use nets as blueprints for MOFs then it would be good to have a measure, other than statistics from known structures, of how complex a network is.…”
Section: A Measure Of Complexity: Transitivity and Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%