2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network analysis of single-subject fMRI during a finger opposition task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a mean Euclidean distance of 9.1± 0.8 mm between the thumb and index finger, compared with 9.61±2.27 mm previously reported (Lotze et al 2000). Our "finger disparity" for control individuals was 5.7 to 9.1 mm from the group average, compared with previous reports of 8.14±1.69 (Smith et al 2006). The consistency between studies suggests that our musicians' finger representations were not expanded, as might have been expected from studies that showed enlarged representations in skilled musicians (Meister et al 2005;Pantev et al 2001;PascualLeone et al 1995).…”
Section: Control Subjects: Finger Representationscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…We found a mean Euclidean distance of 9.1± 0.8 mm between the thumb and index finger, compared with 9.61±2.27 mm previously reported (Lotze et al 2000). Our "finger disparity" for control individuals was 5.7 to 9.1 mm from the group average, compared with previous reports of 8.14±1.69 (Smith et al 2006). The consistency between studies suggests that our musicians' finger representations were not expanded, as might have been expected from studies that showed enlarged representations in skilled musicians (Meister et al 2005;Pantev et al 2001;PascualLeone et al 1995).…”
Section: Control Subjects: Finger Representationscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Multivariate network analyses, such as the scaled subprofile model (SSM) (Moeller et al, 1987), test for regional interactions that can reflect the distributed effects of aging or disease and associated alterations in functional or anatomical connectivity. The SSM has been applied in numerous human functional neuroimaging studies (Alexander and Moeller, 1994;Moeller and Eidelberg, 1997;Alexander et al, 1999;Habeck et al, 2003;Smith et al, 2006). Previous studies of healthy human aging using SSM analysis with structural MRI VBM identified age-related gray matter patterns that included reductions in dorsolateral prefrontal and temporal regions Brickman et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27]). Among others, cortical motor areas include primary (sensori-) motor cortex (SM1) along the central sulcus, supplementary motor areas (SMA) located on the medial surface on the frontal lobes and premotor areas located laterally on the frontal lobes anterior to SM1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%