Network as a business environment: experiences from software industry

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the paper is to describe the differences between networked and non‐networked firms' methods intended to increase profitability, methods for intended growth, implemented and intended openness development, and experiences of networking.Design/methodology/approachThe research approach is empirical and descriptive. Data were gathered by mail survey from Finnish software producers.FindingsNetworked firms intended to improve profitability by boosting resource efficiency, while non‐networked firms concentrated on price increases. No difference occurred in firms' perceptions of their profitability. Networked firms intended to grow by mergers and acquisitions and by cooperation with partners. Non‐networked firms were eager to grow by developing new software products. Networked firms intended to increase information sharing more and were more open in sharing information concerning firms' technical competencies, cost, and commitments to other organizations. Lack of marketing resources was the most important reason for firms to join a network.Research limitations/implicationsThe research setting (how the firms are classified in groups, for example) could benefit from deeper analysis of how network characteristics are connected and which variables best estimate and describe the degree of networking of a firm. A larger sample of firms should be covered to achieve generalizable results. Systematic comparison of industries would also provide essential information on network dynamics.Originality/valueNetworked firms had grown more than non‐networked firms but no connection between profitability perceptions and networking was obtained. In software industry, growth may produce networks but networking seems to support growth.

Exploring Business Competitiveness in High technology Sectors An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican Software Industry

“…One of the aspects that emphasizes the innovating nature of a company is the outsourcing activities (Kulmala & Uusi-Rauva, 2005). Interaction and cooperation with industrial customers, suppliers, associations, public agencies and other agents external to the company can provide access to resources that would otherwise be difficult to access.…”

“…The final number of usable questionnaires was 198; the response rate was 9.3% over the total population. It is important to mention that, due to the fast rate of change in the software industry, it is hard to define a world-wide or even national total population of software companies (Kulmala et al, 2005). The respondents in this study were mainly owners and managers of small and medium size businesses.…”

Critical Success Factors in the Software Industry and Their Relation With Strategic Business Orientation: An Empirical-Exploratory Study

“…En este artículo se presentan los resultados de la identificación de grupos de orientación estratégica de negocio (por coste o diferenciación) en la IndSW y las relaciones identificadas con los FCE del sector, teniendo como objeto de estudio la IndSW de México 49 sencilla, debido a que no existe un dato consolidado (KUHMALA, 2005), y a que éste varía según la fuente consultada, además de que es difícil rastrearlo y medirlo, ya que se tiene el problema añadido de valorar la parte de software sin licencia.…”

A Study on OSS Marketing and Communication Strategies

“…Moreover, software products evolve quickly, often with decreasing intervals between releases, and become obsolete in a short time [3]: this fast and competitive market pushes companies to focus on product development rather than marketing aspects.…”