2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31830-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Compression by Node and Edge Mergers

Abstract: We give methods to compress weighted graphs (i.e., networks or BisoNets) into smaller ones. The motivation is that large networks of social, biological, or other relations can be complex to handle and visualize. Using the given methods, nodes and edges of a give graph are grouped to supernodes and superedges, respectively. The interpretation (i.e. decompression) of a compressed graph is that a pair of original nodes is connected by an edge if their supernodes are connected by one, and that the weight of an edg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those in the first class are sampling methods in which a simplified network is represented by a random sample of the original network (e.g., random node selection [28], random link selection [29], snowball sampling [30], random walk sampling [9] and forest fire [9]). Methods in the second class obtain simplified networks by merging nodes and links into supernodes and superlinks based on different characteristics, such as the distance between nodes (e.g., cluster-growing and box-tiling renormalization [31]), node and link attributes (e.g., link weights [32] and node attributes [33]) or community structure (e.g., balanced propagation and modularity optimization [34]).…”
Section: Simplification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those in the first class are sampling methods in which a simplified network is represented by a random sample of the original network (e.g., random node selection [28], random link selection [29], snowball sampling [30], random walk sampling [9] and forest fire [9]). Methods in the second class obtain simplified networks by merging nodes and links into supernodes and superlinks based on different characteristics, such as the distance between nodes (e.g., cluster-growing and box-tiling renormalization [31]), node and link attributes (e.g., link weights [32] and node attributes [33]) or community structure (e.g., balanced propagation and modularity optimization [34]).…”
Section: Simplification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Network sampling means obtaining the main network structure through sampling representative nodes or edges, which is extensively overviewed in the study of Ahmed, Neville, and Kompella (2014). Second, to turn the original network into a smaller skeleton, coarse graining means merging nodes or edges according to certain rules (Itzkovitz et al, 2004), such as the attribute of node or edge (Toivonen et al, 2012), community structure (Blagus et al, 2012). The most common one is the filter-based method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parameter ϵ bounds the error (details are algorithm-specific). We exhaustively analyzed existing schemes [14,40,47,61,67,93,103,104,115,126,130,141,[152][153][154]168]. We focus on SWeG, a recent scheme [141] that constructs supervertices with a generalized Jaccard similarity.…”
Section: Spanners With Slimmentioning
confidence: 99%