2016
DOI: 10.5937/industrija1-8886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network externalities in telecommunication industry: An analysis of Serbian market

Abstract: This paper deals with network competition and provides empirical analysis of market concentration, network and call externalities, access pricing, price discrimination and switching costs in Serbian mobile phone telecommunications market. It is shown that network externalities governed the expansion of this market until 2008. Upon entry of VIP incumbents didn't engage in predatory behaviour towards entrant aiming to benefit from lockedin users. The policy of mobile phone number portability reduced on-net price… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence that individual choice of operator is influenced by the total number of subscribers for each operator, but a much stronger effect is the operator choice of other household members [17]. Trifunovic, Mitrovic, and Ristic [18] have determined that users of the network with the largest market share benefit the most from call externalities. In addition, one network does not price discriminate between outgoing and incoming roaming calls, which implies that users of this network have higher level pecuniary externalities in roaming compared to users of price discriminating networks [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is some evidence that individual choice of operator is influenced by the total number of subscribers for each operator, but a much stronger effect is the operator choice of other household members [17]. Trifunovic, Mitrovic, and Ristic [18] have determined that users of the network with the largest market share benefit the most from call externalities. In addition, one network does not price discriminate between outgoing and incoming roaming calls, which implies that users of this network have higher level pecuniary externalities in roaming compared to users of price discriminating networks [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trifunovic, Mitrovic, and Ristic [18] have determined that users of the network with the largest market share benefit the most from call externalities. In addition, one network does not price discriminate between outgoing and incoming roaming calls, which implies that users of this network have higher level pecuniary externalities in roaming compared to users of price discriminating networks [18]. The existence of positive externalities between contents and applications available on Internet and their effects on the incentives of network operators to provide neutral access, emphasize the importance of regulating this area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers prefer subscribing to a large, rather than a small network, since the former offers a higher value in the sense of the number of people they could reach, resulting in large network becoming even bigger and more attractive to future consumers in comparison to smaller networks (Kim and Kwon, 2003). The dominance of a single network due to market externalities represents a serious threat to the overall competitiveness of the sector (Blonski, 2002;Shy, 2003;Trifunovic et al, 2015) because the dominant network is able to sustain much higher prices of its services without the fear of losing its market share. To avert this, mandatory interconnection ensures that a consumer subscribing to any network will have access to consumers from all other networks, thus eliminating to a certain degree the potentially negative role of network externalities.…”
Section: Network Externalities In Telecommunicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The market growth rate was very high until 2008 and then much slower from 2009 until 2011; the market stabilised at 10.1 million users in 2011 and subsequent years. The state-owned company, MTS, was the largest operator in the market until between 2009 and 2014 it lost 1.4 million users (or 23.54%) while its competitors increased their number of users -Telenor by 5 A more detailed analysis of the Serbian market is presented in Trifunović and Mitrović (2016b).…”
Section: The Serbian Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%