2015
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2015.7321979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network virtualization and resource description in software-defined wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we limited our exploration on wired Ethernet network technologies. Nonetheless, a number of standardization bodies have developed detailed ontologies of additional network technologies, like LTE [34] and sensor networks [35]. Existing production SDN technologies provide limited control below the data link layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we limited our exploration on wired Ethernet network technologies. Nonetheless, a number of standardization bodies have developed detailed ontologies of additional network technologies, like LTE [34] and sensor networks [35]. Existing production SDN technologies provide limited control below the data link layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of describing services has already been identified in the literature (Sec III-C1) but without satisfactory resolution. A good approach to address this void is to develop domain-specific description languages that allow the expression of service characteristics, KPIs and network element capabilities and requirements in a comprehensive manner while retaining a simple and intuitive syntax (e.g., in the philosophy of [14] to be used in multi-vendor environments. A desirable feature would also be the capability to compose complex rules and expressions out of simpler ones, introducing abstraction layers in the expression of service requirements.…”
Section: End-to-end Slice Orchestration and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Result end-to-end throughput of stations which the SSS algorithm is applied. The stations shown in the figure are Sta 5,8,9,11,13,14,22,23,24,25,27. network is denoted in the x-axis, and the width of the dots denotes the scale of the semantic knowledge graph adopted by each network. As expected, the scale of knowledge base is proportional to the scale of the network.…”
Section: Overheadmentioning
confidence: 99%