2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural codes in the thalamocortical auditory system: From artificial stimuli to communication sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(124 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of coding timescale, the information about individuals is found in spike patterns on a shorter integration window (∼10 ms), whereas the information about distance is in the firing rate estimated over longer windows (∼30 ms). The fact that the best discrimination for identity is found with short time windows corroborates numerous studies showing that neurons use a spike timing strategy to encode vocalizations (Wang et al, 2007; Huetz et al, 2011; Gaucher et al, 2013; Elie and Theunissen, 2015) and is consistent with what was found previously for neural discrimination of conspecific song in the Field L of zebra finches (Narayan et al, 2006). These spike patterns might originate from processing a particular sequence of acoustic features, but additional neuronal mechanisms must be in place to preserve this information despite the natural variations in these acoustic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In terms of coding timescale, the information about individuals is found in spike patterns on a shorter integration window (∼10 ms), whereas the information about distance is in the firing rate estimated over longer windows (∼30 ms). The fact that the best discrimination for identity is found with short time windows corroborates numerous studies showing that neurons use a spike timing strategy to encode vocalizations (Wang et al, 2007; Huetz et al, 2011; Gaucher et al, 2013; Elie and Theunissen, 2015) and is consistent with what was found previously for neural discrimination of conspecific song in the Field L of zebra finches (Narayan et al, 2006). These spike patterns might originate from processing a particular sequence of acoustic features, but additional neuronal mechanisms must be in place to preserve this information despite the natural variations in these acoustic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These investigations in model systems led to the discovery of cricket-song selective neurons and their contribution to the females' phonotaxis behavior [77], of call selective neurons in frogs [78] and guinea pigs [79], of song selective neurons in songbirds [7,[80][81][82], of neurons selective to the echolocation signal in bats [5], and of brain regions selective for conspecific calls in primates [83]. Selectivity for conspecific communication calls can be reflected not only in the mean rate of single neurons but also (and sometimes only) in time-varying responses [84,85] or ensemble responses [86,87]. Thus, the auditory system is not only selective to natural sounds in a broad sense but appears to also exhibit specialized circuitry for the sole purpose of detecting and processing conspecific communication calls.…”
Section: Animal Vocalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the somatosensory network, the auditory thalamocortical system is also extensively studied (Huetz et al 2011;Imaizumi and Lee 2014;Lee 2013;Winer et al 2005). However, it is challenging to record simultaneously the activity of the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate body, MGB) and the auditory cortex (AC) because of the lateral location of the AC and the relatively small size of the MGB.…”
Section: Tonotopic Mapping In the Auditory Thalamus Of Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%