2012
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0570-12.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Induced Motion Perception in the Human Brain

Abstract: A physically stationary stimulus surrounded by a moving stimulus appears to move in the opposite direction. There are similarities between the characteristics of this phenomenon of induced motion and surround suppression of directionally selective neurons in the brain. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate the link between the subjective perception of induced motion and cortical activity. The visual stimuli consisted of a central drifting sinusoid surrounded by a moving random-dot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of pRF size increase differs between visual field maps (Figure 1); this observation has now been repeated many times [18, 2225]. FMRI enables us to measure this fundamental relationship noninvasively in an individual human subject during a half-hour long experiment.…”
Section: The Prf Model For Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of pRF size increase differs between visual field maps (Figure 1); this observation has now been repeated many times [18, 2225]. FMRI enables us to measure this fundamental relationship noninvasively in an individual human subject during a half-hour long experiment.…”
Section: The Prf Model For Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual motion localizer was added as we found increases in the BOLD signal in MT during processing of non-symbolic numerosities in a previous experiment (Cavdaroglu et al, 2015). The motion localizer was based on the MT localizer described in Takemura et al (2012).…”
Section: Localizer Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified the border between visual areas (V1, V2, V3, hV4, V3A/B, VO, LO, TO and IPS-0) based on the reversal of polar angle, eccentricity and anatomical landmarks (Press et al 2001;Dougherty et al 2003;Brewer et al 2005;Larsson and Heeger 2006;Amano et al 2009;Witthoft et al 2014;Winawer and Witthoft 2015). Technical details of the method are described in previous publications (Dumoulin and Wandell 2008;Amano et al 2009;Winawer et al 2010;Takemura et al 2012).…”
Section: Cortical Area Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%