Neural Encoding of Odors during Active Sampling and in Turbulent Plumes

Abstract

Summary Sensory inputs are often fluctuating and intermittent, yet animals reliably utilize them to direct behavior. Here we ask how natural stimulus fluctuations influence the dynamic neural encoding of odors. Using the locust olfactory system, we isolated two main causes of odor intermittency: chaotic odor plumes and active sampling behaviors. Despite their irregularity, chaotic odor plumes still drove dynamic neural response features including the synchronization, temporal patterning, and short-term plasticity of spiking in projection neurons, enabling classifier-based stimulus identification and activating downstream decoders (Kenyon cells). Locusts can also impose odor intermittency through active sampling movements with their unrestrained antennae. Odors triggered immediate, spatially-targeted antennal scanning that, paradoxically, weakened individual neural responses. However, these frequent but weaker responses were highly informative about stimulus location. Thus, not only are odor-elicited dynamic neural responses compatible with natural stimulus fluctuations and important for stimulus identification, but locusts actively increase intermittency, possibly to improve stimulus localization.

Natural search algorithms as a bridge between organisms, evolution, and ecology

“…Mapping natural search algorithms onto the MAB framework would constitute a major step toward a quantitative understanding of the similarities and differences between search strategies. Recent studies of the neural and biophysical mechanisms involved in search behavior (6,7,9,10,46,58) provide the quantitative information needed to define such models in a way that respects the constraints on search strategies in real biological systems.…”

Smelling Time: A Neural Basis for Olfactory Scene Analysis

“…Flicking in the spiny lobster, for example, occupies approximately 100 msec, with a duty cycle of 500 msec during periods of active sampling [23, 24], and would confound encoding only the shortest time intervals between whiffs of odor. Flicking appears to trade off this loss of temporal resolution to enhance detection of the onset of the whiff [23] and thus presumably enhances the accuracy of encoding time, as may occur in other animals since active sampling movements of the antenna enhance encoding of stimulus location in locusts [25]. …”

Carpenter ants use diverse antennae sampling strategies to track odor trails

“…Previous studies in various species have analyzed large-scale antennal movements in response to stimuli (e.g. Huston, 2015;Pribbenow, 1996), but finer movements and distinct strategies are largely uncharacterized. Given the importance of understanding how sensors are moved to sample the environment and gather information to guide behavior, our models in ants provide an important basis for future studies.…”